“THE MESSIAH”

Otago Daily Times, Issue 22125, 1 December 1933, Page 7

“THE MESSIAH”

TO THE EDITOB.

Sir—ln your issue. of' the 28th inst. . 'appears a letter over .the signature of j containing a^‘request,” but \ '■ consisting mainly of comments—not particularly favourable —upon last year’s performance of “ The Messiah.” No doubt the writer refers to the Dunedin Choral Society’s presentation and I would crave space to submit some remarks in reply. '•.‘qModerato ” appears to set himself up as' an authority on the work, but his . remarks certainly give rise to doubt on that- point. Regarding the tempo at which the were sung, I think it is well known that metronome tunings are intended mainly as guides, and the fact' that one conductor takes movements faster or slower than another is no proof that "either, is right or wrong. There must always be a reasonable latitude. Other- ' wise presentations would be painfully mechanical; There would also be no scope for exercise of individuality and the many factors which go to make up an attractive performance. In the second paragraph of his letter “Moderate ” complains about "the inclusion of several ‘pieces’ not generally f sung at ‘ Messiah ’ concerts, etc.” Here he displays ignorance caused probably by his not having previously heard the complete work. Let me tell him that the: whole of “The Messiah,” and only “The Messiah,” was sung last year. Further, it was the first time the complete work was given in Dunedin. This course was prompted by the receipt of many personal requests and by repeated suggestions from the press that the complete work should be given. The suggestion by “ Moderate ” concerning orchestra and organ embodies only an expression of opinion worth very little. If he makes suitable inquiry, or reads up recent announcements about the forthcoming performance, he can find out why the orchestra and organ could not play together.. Further, no organ, however well played, can produce the colouring and effect that a good orchestra can. In 1931 the organ only was used, and after that it was thought that better results could he obtained by using both organ and orchestra. "‘Moderate” could very easily find a greater number Who were delighted with last,years’ performance than were disappointed. , I have before me your report of the performance, and can find nothing but praise for,all concerned—conductor, soloists, chorus, orchestra, and organist —this, I may say, notwithstanding the fact that your reporter always deals with these performances critically, but, of course, justly. I may inform “ Moderate.” that this year’s presentation will consist of the numbers in the work which he has usually heard. The organ and orchestra will both be heard, and 1 •■would suggest that if he book his seats for the performance and induce his friends to do likewise they will hear a thoroughly satisfactory and enjoyable presentation of this beautiful work. I would conclude by quoting the penultimate sentence of your 1932 report: ■« ][{ Mr Walmsley could be persuaded to present ‘The Messiah’ again he should be assured of a packed hall.” Let us hope that the hall will be packed!—l am, etc., Prestissimo. November 29.