MAGISTRATE’S COURT

Otago Daily Times, Issue 21411, 12 August 1931, Page 13

MAGISTRATE’S COURT

Tuesday, August 11. (Before Mr J. E. Bartholomew, S.M.) UNDEFENDED CASES. Judgment for the plaintiff was given in the following undefended cases:—Bing, Harris, and (Jo., Ltd., v. Fred. Hanson and Henry Hanson (Pareora), £lB 13s Id, for goods supplied, with costs (£3 3s)); Wright and Prescott v. Percy Lewis; £2 10s sd, for goods supplied with costa (£1 5s Cd); Dawsons, Ltd., v. Richard Grimmetto (Oamaru), costs only (13s); Dawsons. Ltd., v. Alexander Ramsay Whyte (Pomahaka), £2 10s, for goods supplied, with costs (£1 8s 6cl); Robert Barreil and James William Thomson v. Herbert Mitchell, £2B 18s, rent due, with costs (£4 Is 6d); Alliance Bee Supplies Company, Ltd., v. Mathieson Bros. (Heddon Bush), £0 8s 6d, for goods supplied, with costs (£2 2s 6d); C. and W. Shiel, Ltd., v. Angus W. C. M‘Donald, £2 11s 3d, for goods supplied, with costs (fI 6s 6d); Electric and Plumbing Supplies, Ltd., v. Peter C. Boyle (Auckland), £2 16s, for goods supplied, with costs (£1 8s 6d): Cossens and Black, Ltd., v. Frank A. Cheyne (Kurow), £ls 18s 3d, goods supplied and interest due, with costs (£2 17s); Brown, Ewing, and Co., Ltd., v. Wolsey Kain (Nevis), £l2 13s lOd, for goods supplied, with costs (£2 16s); William John Pile (Karitane) v. Dayid John Evans, £l2 17s 4d. rent due and electric power consumed, with coats (£2 14s); D.1.C., Ltd., v. Isabella Scott (Gore), 13s 6d, for goods supplied, with costs (8s): J. Bryan v. C. Murtagh (Purakanui), £1 15s, taxi hire.' with costs (17a); J. M'Grath and Co. v. H. J. Turnbull (Mpsgiel), £3 12s Od, for goods supplied, with costs (£1 3s 6d): Stronach, Morris, and Co., Ltd., v. A. Magnus, £5 13s lOd, for goods supplied, with costs (£1 12s 6d). RESERVED DECISION, . Reserved judgment was given in the case in which the inspector of awards (Mr N. F. Johnston) proceeded against Lucy May Hal! (Mr Barnett) claiming £2O penalty for two breaches of the New Zealand private hotel employees’ award. - On the first breach judgment was given for the plaintiff, with no penalty, and on the second breach judgment was given for the plaintiff for £2, with costs (15s). JUDGMENT SUMMONSES. J. Townsend v. G. B. Harness, claim £7 11s. —The defendant was ordered to pay the amount claimed, with costs (12s). in default seven days’ imprisonment. James Moir v. D. Anderson, claim £4 lls 6d; Dunford Bros. v. same, claim £10; Charles Gamble v. same, claim £lo.—After the defendant had given evidence, the magistrate refused to make an order' in each ease.