MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 21265, 20 February 1931, Page 4

MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Thursday, February 19. (Before Mr J. R. Bartholomew, S.M.) UNDEFENDED CASES. Judgment for plaintiff was given in the following undefended cases:—R. Fulton v. R. Murphy, f 1 17s, for professional services, with costs (15s); J. Johnston v. Cyril M. Stonyer (Timaru), £1 6s, for goods supplied, with costs (13s); Harold Banks v. C. A. Hutton, £lO 9s, for goods supplied, with costs (£2 17s); A. Taylor and Sons, Ltd., v. J. L. Callander, £1 10s, for goods supplied, with costs (11s) ; Wright, Stephenson and Co., Ltd., v. William George Renwick (Wingatui), £24 12s sd, for goods supplied, with costs (£4 9s 6d).-j F. and R, Woods, Ltd., v. M. Collins, 17s 6d, for goods supplied, with'costs, (9s); J. and J. Arthur, Ltd., v. H. McDonald, £1 6s, for goods supplied, with costs (10s); Solomon, Gascoigne, Solomon, and Co., v. Arthur Ernest Jeffs (Middlemarch). £5, for professional services, with costs (£1 3s 6d); John Logan Milnes v. Dusan Miller (Port Chalmers), £24 17s, for goods supplied,, with costs £1 10s) ; J. and J. Arthur v. Donald Fergus M‘Kay, £6 11s sd, for goods supplied, with costs (£1 11s Gd); John Barrowman v. Gilbert Charles Benfell, £8 10s, for goods supplied,'with costs (£1 12s 6d); Edward Green v. R, W. C. Steele (Hastings), £4 16s 6d, interest due, with costs (£1 3s 6d); D. A. Jolly and Sons, Ltd., v. G. W. Carr, £1 6s Id, for goods supplied, with costs (10s). , JUDGMENT SUMMONSES. Para Rubber Company, Ltd., y. A. E. Laney, claim for £3 10s 6d.—The defendant was ordered to pay the amount with costs (8s), in default four days’ imprisonment. The Reliable Loan and Investment Corporation, Ltd., v. A. E. Laney, claim for £4 5s 3d. —The defendant was ordered to pay the amount, with costs (8s), in default five days’ imprisonment. Elizabeth M‘Ara (Mr E. J. Anderson) v. Cecil Campbell (Mr G. T. Bay lee) claim for £6 rent due to May 17, 1930. The defendant entered a counter-claim .for £45 10s on the grounds that on February 24, .1930, the plaintiff had let him a furnished house for 12 months, and that on April 10 the plaintiff removed certain furniture from the house, in- consequence of which the defendant was unable to continue as a boarding-house keeper. The loss of profits from April 10, 1930, until February 24, 1931, at £1 per week would amount to £45 10s. —After evidence along the lines of the claim and the counterclaim had been heard the magistrate gave judgment .for plaintiff on the claim and the counterclaim, with costs.