Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNEMPLOYMENT.

TO THE EDITOR. . Sivertseu implies in. answer to Farmer No, 2,” that the price of tam labour rose in sympathy with the rise in farm produce. As he stated a date when ( wages commenced to rise, I Will give him a few figures to show him that the price of farm labour is above the cost of production unless the farmer or his family does the work themselves, .thirty years ago the prices of farm ?£°f uc ® ve , re as follows:—Best bullocks. £7 to £9; best wethers, 10s to 17s; best lambs, 11s to 13s; best wheat, 2s 6d per bushel; oats, milling, Is 7d to Is 9d; potatoes, £2 12s 6d per ton; chaff, 40s to 52s per ton; butter, 6d to 9d per lb; cheese, 4d to fid per lb; bacon. 6d to Bd. these prices will show that it was not the increased value of farm produce that caused wages to _ rise, but other things that made the price of farm labour more than double what it used to be. Labour agitators, cannot tell the farmer his business, and if labour cannot be employed to show a profit, it is done without. —I am, etc -. Farmer No. 2.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19300522.2.81.3

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 21032, 22 May 1930, Page 10

Word Count
202

UNEMPLOYMENT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 21032, 22 May 1930, Page 10

UNEMPLOYMENT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 21032, 22 May 1930, Page 10