Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Friday, December 20. (Before Mr J. R. Bartholomew, S.M.)

MOTOR COLLISION,

Ronald Ballantyne Arnott v. T. D. Dalziel, claim £l3O J s 3d, arising out of a collision between the plaintiflrs motor cycle and the defendants motor lorry, as a result of which the plaintiff had his cycle damaged and received extensive injuries, his leg being fractured. Mr R. A. King appeared for tbc plaintiff. Mr A. N. Haggitt for the defendant.—The hearing of the case was continued, further evidence being heard in support of the plaintiff’s case—For the defence, Mr Haggitt contended that the plaintiff struck the lorry; the lorry did not strike him, and the plaintiff, who was travelling at a fairly high rate of speed, did not have control of his machine just prior to the time of impact.—Evidence was heard, and counsel addressed the court, after which his Worship reserved his judgment.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19291221.2.137

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 20906, 21 December 1929, Page 20

Word Count
148

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 20906, 21 December 1929, Page 20

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 20906, 21 December 1929, Page 20