Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RUGBY UNION v. RUGBY LEAGUE.

to tut! rnrroa. .Sin,—T admit, in ansmr (o fnbiassed,” that I should not havct used ihe word "supr'‘ma/-y” in i-r-!atio:i to (he position of Mew- Zealand in the rootba.ll world. I’.ut, that, does not r,;f. . i ih„ object of my I letter. which was to call attention to the detrimental effect (.lint a split in football would bring about in lowering Xeir Zealand In a, second rale position. If the {whole cannot el,aim supremacy certainly the hall of tine dominion could not elaim very ii'iidi. 1 f.n«t that ■"•Unbiassed” will rot deny that. —I am, Ho., Union - is .Strcxotu.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19240823.2.116

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 19258, 23 August 1924, Page 17

Word Count
104

RUGBY UNION v. RUGBY LEAGUE. Otago Daily Times, Issue 19258, 23 August 1924, Page 17

RUGBY UNION v. RUGBY LEAGUE. Otago Daily Times, Issue 19258, 23 August 1924, Page 17