AUSTRALIAN NAVY
.; , .1 "** -i ADMIRAL DUMABESQ’S CBM^P^c|' : | REPLY BY MR HUGHES. ' . v -i ' ■ . • ~ ' Pxeu Aasooiation—By Telegraph—Copyright. : r ! SYDNEY, Mr Hughes, whilst agreeing with many ;'4| of Admiral Dumaresq’s be considers that his remark* werd'ia ’bod : l taste. Any such criticism from the Naval. Board, which advisor.-tlia -1 Government. The remarks are at;eflecticai J on Admiral Dumaresq’s superior■-officer,-y ; | Admiral Everett, who was directly mended by Admiral Beatty; Respecting' v the statement that Australia had not paid the same, amount per head of popqlatign on the Navy as England, Mr Hughes said ? the statement was gratuitous, -uncalled for, and improper.' Australia's-nawaLefc. penditurd had been greater than tiatbf } all the' other* dominions put together. ! -i
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19220503.2.46
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 18544, 3 May 1922, Page 5
Word Count
112AUSTRALIAN NAVY Otago Daily Times, Issue 18544, 3 May 1922, Page 5
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.