THE PRIVY COUNCIL
I COLONIAL APPEAL CASES. Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright LONDON, February 21. I The appeal of the Commissioners n t, Taxation of New South Wales v. Adam • lus been allowed, ihe appellants payin a the costs, in acconlancc with their ttntlet i. taking. 1 Special leave to appeal in forma pai I' ]>cris was rcfiisod in the case of Ah 0 ;- v. the Attorney-general of New Zealand alwi the appeal of Jone3 v. Lcfroy, c New Zee.land. (Pin Uxitbd Prkm Associatios.) NAPIER, February 22. Ah On. who, according to n cablegram ha« been refused leave to appeal i forma pauperis, was. convicted of keepin a common gaminu-house, and fined £2( Messrs Dolan and Ferguson brought th case before the Appellate Court at We linglon, when the Chief Justice re.fcrre to it as " a comedy of errors," b\ refused to quash the conviction. M n .lellieoe then appealed in forma, pauperis ', j with the result stated.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19120223.2.47
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 15385, 23 February 1912, Page 5
Word Count
156THE PRIVY COUNCIL Otago Daily Times, Issue 15385, 23 February 1912, Page 5
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.