MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Otago Daily Times, Issue 14683, 17 November 1909, Page 7

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Tuesday, Novkuue!: 16. ,'Beiorc Mr II Y. Widdowson. S.M.) Judgment was given for plaintiffs by dofault in ;he following undefended eases:— Thomas G. Patrick (Mr Moore) v. James William-,, claim £1 19s 2d, on account state I (costs ss); A. and T. Burt, Ltd. (Mr Moore) v. James Enright (St. Uathans), claim £8 9s lid, on account stated (cosls £1 8s 6d); Johnston, Sons, and Co. (Mr Scantlcbury) v. Charles Allen, jun., claim £1 17s 6d, books sold and delivered (costs ss); same v. Albert M'Lecd (Christehurch), claim £2 3s, on acjount stated (costs 10s); eai'o v. Alexander Waters (Lyttoltoii). Claim £2 12s Cd. on account stated (cosis 10s)s same v. Charles James Rouse, claim £3 4s, on account stated (cost's 10s); Thomson, Bridgor, and Co. (Mr Moore) v. Charles Canning and Co. (Napier), claim £3 14s 6d, on a dishonoured chcmio (cosls 10s); Frederick Nieliol (Mr fru-in) v. Arthur Halh.vay, claim £4 5?, on account slated (costs 10s); Robert Hart (Mr D. Cooke) v. William Joseph Dwycr, claim £LBs 6d, on account staled (costs ss); M.I 0 Domiell and Co. (Mr Bundle) v. William '' Wintnip, claim Bs, for cosls; Thomas Res (Mr Evymg) v. Augustus P. Gawn (Tiniaiu), claim Js, tor costs. Judgment Summonses.-Dawson and Co , Ltd (Mr Irwin) v. John M'Gull'og (Balclutha), eloim ±11 is, on a judgment sum-inons.-Dcfeiidant did not appear, and an order was made for payment within a fortnight, m default 48 hours' imprisonment Thonus Scurr (Mr C. N. trcurr) v. Albert llellycr clan,, £2 14s, on a judgment summons -Defendant did not appear, ami his Worship made an order for pavment within a fortntghl, with cost-s (6s). in'default three m >S '"'P"? 0 ""' 5 -'"*- Adams ami Crabho (Mr__ Ca Inn) v. Christopher ITickev. claim -o as oil, on u judgment sunimons.-Dcfen-tlatlt ilul no! appear, and 0 n Mr Callun's application, and on seeing a consenting |«t!«r from defendant, his Worship made au order varying the payment (o the rate of Ss nor week, ns from the date „f h-sarin^.-- - latnck Drnnini v. William Walk-r (Mr lrivin), daim £3 Os 6d, on a judgment sun/ ■nous-Defendant pleaded hard times, but lis Worsh,,) expressed Ihe opinion that as no amount had been owing for five vcar« he could have paid if he jiad tried.'- An order would be made for navment nl the rato of os per week as from date i "/ V Aw «"l--Jo-ie|'h Hollows T° COr °' A «««l«) v. Harold M'l'ar7®> P( " n '"- V for a l™<* '"' the 01 • S "'" ,i: " ,i ward,-in that ,| e fc„. "'. being over , 8 years of age, was omeir "I? '"•' " SSiS . t " llt t'tocer by John ;,< Tl,« '. I " lt -" i tlla " ls provided for of the' 3VoZ- Li „„ ( r ilt! ' r r • bw ? i,h *»* «'■> he did not know m W w" over 18 years ol age. 11,. 1,.„ i '". [ Wa« back wages. Ji-F« r |«,' T* l "f notice to leave when the inform,!; "" laid.-Jlis Worship sau Was "ung into account, he flient for 10;. r ■•""•>