Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DAIRY INDUSTRY ACT.

AN INTERESTING POINT.

(Per United Pjiess Association.) T . AUCKLAND, April 30. Judgment was given by Mr Justice Cooper this afternoon m the appeal caso of Brown v. Anbury, in which tho point involved was '0 interpretation of the regulations under The Dairy Industrv Act, 1898.-' Appellant w a dairy inspector and respondent a dairyman, who was charged with a breach of tho regi»!alio»i s by failing to cleansc, within a period of four houra aftor " se . tho milk-eans usod in or about his dairy.- the case had been dismissed by tho magistrate on tho ground that tho fact's did not .show that Mr 1 Ambury was the responsible party. His Honor remarked that as respondent was in possession of the cans from 6.30 in tho evening until 9 o'clock next morninc the regulation would bu a dead lotter if ho were not the person to be held responsible for the cleansing of the cans. He allowed tho appeal, wjth £7 7s costs, ordering reference back to the magistrate with a direction iliat a brcaoh of the regulation had been committed. As tho conviction earned with it the cancellation of respondent s license, and respondent had acted honestly m contesting the regulation, he suggested that a fresh licenso should bo granted to him or tlio information withdrawn.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19070501.2.72

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 13891, 1 May 1907, Page 5

Word Count
219

DAIRY INDUSTRY ACT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 13891, 1 May 1907, Page 5

DAIRY INDUSTRY ACT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 13891, 1 May 1907, Page 5