Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

« d Monday, May 2, , g (Before Mr E. 11. Carew, R.M.) James ltunciniiin v. Catherine Turnbull.— ~ Claim -I-.-1S 13s -lil, on two dishonoured promissory 3i notes —Mr Haggitt appeared for the plaintiff, for whom judgment was given for the amount ~ claimed, wit'i costs, in the absence of the deleii»t '.lames Duthie and Co. v. Thomas George de Renzy.—Claim L 3 lCs sd, for carting 'lt"i e and ' money paid by plaintiffs on behalf of defendant. 5- -Jlrl'rasH appeared fov thu planitif.s, ami Mr n Wilkinson for the defendant, who paid LI 10s 5d into court—His Worship, after healing the T evidence, said the defendant was contradicted ■* strongly by two witnesses, and there was also a 18 strong presumption against him from the fact that after receiving the claim he made no objection to it till quite lately. Judgment would be c for the plidntill's for the amount claimed, with [' costs, less the amount paid into court.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18920503.2.37

Bibliographic details

Otago Daily Times, Issue 9417, 3 May 1892, Page 4

Word Count
159

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 9417, 3 May 1892, Page 4

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 9417, 3 May 1892, Page 4