DISTRICT COURT.
Thubsday, 23rd September. (Before his Honor Judge Harvey.) PATTIKSON V. THE TUANSATLANTIC INSURANCE COMPANY. In this case, in which a verdict had been previously given for the defendants, Mr Denniston applied for a new trial, as additional evidence, which would materially strengthen the plaintiff's case, had been obtained. Mr Haggitt opposed the application, on the grounds that it had Dot been made soon enough according to. the rules of the Court, and that the plaintiff could not make out a caee._ His Honor refused to grant a new trial. SARAH CHAPMAN V. ROBERT OXLEY. Claim L2OO, damages for breach of a covenant to keep a farm (A.lwent Grange) at Waik«uaiti in good order and condition. Mr Haggitt appeared for the plaintiff and Mr Stout for the defendant. After 10 witnesses had been-exammed for the plaintiff, the case was adjourned till the f< Ilowing day.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18800924.2.25
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 5803, 24 September 1880, Page 3
Word Count
146DISTRICT COURT. Otago Daily Times, Issue 5803, 24 September 1880, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.