SUPREMECOURT CIVIL SESSION.
; ::: Wednesday,. September 9th.v --.'.'. .'■'-' - (Before His BLonor, Mr Justice Cnapman;) The Special Jurbri summoned attended, and were released for the day; ; ,:. O»BEt.£ % J.9NE& —Jllr Srply^hies' app^libd »to ihave this- case .reinstatedUon the rlist. He' urjged the hardship^ -tci'the jEjlamt^ wMoh-woaid^■result :s£ lifer b Teing:cilrarge'd;" with an indictabler offencej ie was 1 'compelle;d to remain' for: three months without ,ajakiopportunity of clearing ihiaKcnaracter."■■■■•"•;.{"-■- ■ ■■].':■.:.■?.'.. ■>■.-. :..!:.■.•.•.•■...,•.;
"THe. Judge said that the application, must be made in Chambers. • : .-
SiPECIAIi: PERFOjRJtAKCE OB"; AN AGEE&-
liOGAtr vi «. Cea WFokb. r—Mr ■ liacassey (with, himj^^ Mr'Howbrth) appeared-for-the plaintiff, John Logan, secretary- ;fo>f.the Superintendent $. and Mr Barton-was for the defendant, James Robert Crawford, BUrgeOlli' vi !-:^:i-.,;..-f;-i-.0-;..- ■•/. ■'■■■,; :f-v.V - ■
; Therj auction t was .an Equitable one,^|bir the specific performance of m agreement; .for a leasq of premises in Princes street, j The case for/. the.; plaintiff,.; as made iron~\ '^he/declaration^ was this—He is the owner I ,6f ..land in Princes, being part .'of' section 31, block 15, on the record map! ofthe' cltjr^.;ln':May, '■ 186£ he commenced! :(the ground havingVbeen cleared by thej fire on .the Ist April) to erect a two^storey; :t)uii,dmg v bf brick/, the lower part .being; intended for two shops, and the-upper! part for?!a dwelling house. In the same! month, a verbal agreement., was made: with the defendant,for a lease of :„ one* of j the shopsyfor two years fronvthe delivery! of possession, at L 2 a week. On the 20fchj June, a memorandum'df agreement to this; effect was signed by the parties :—They,; having previously agreed for a lease of the; shop, for two years certain, at L 2 a week,: a further agreement was now made. The: dwelling house " to be fitted up as showri by Dr. Crawford to,the architect," and a.kitchen to be erected below; the rent to be fixed by arbitration; a lease for the whole, for-fiver years,^from Jhe. Ist, iJiily, 1867, to be prepared, and Dr. Crawfbrd to execute it. The plaintiff named'C. fl.i Street to act ;on his . behalf, in fix( ing the rent, and the defendant named— 4 Craig, of Craig and Gillies, cabinet makers.! The plaintiff had the work completed ;as required. The defendant .took possesT : sioh' of the shop on 6r about July Ist | of the dwelling house, on September* 16th j and of the kitchen on the., Ist February, 1868. Mr Street has always been ready and willing to proceed to fix th^ rent; but Mr Craig, with the knowledge and by the direction of the defendant f has refused to proceed, although the defendant has remained, and remains, in possession. The plaintiff had always been ready to complete'the lease, and to make fair allowance for the.: period after the fixed date during, which, possession was not given of the house and kitchen ;" but the defendant had refused, &c. Wherefore, the plaintiff prayed taafc itmight be declared that the agreement of|' the 20th June was binding ; that the d£| fendant should be required to. allow Cra^ toiproeeed fco fix the-rent, .afid^hjat ia; default, it shouldibe; fixed by^ the. R|gis;trar; : that the IlegLsWar "shbnld-alsolap--" prove of a' draft lease.; £. and'ifliat^the.lda? fendant should pay taxed - costs.-^The; defendant pleaded a denial..of' ;^]l^tb\e, material 4 allegations '■■ ; in the except in so far" as that he made tsßi agreement1 stated, and took 'possessions^ theshppjin/ the month of May.' ;; r^/ ,- ; '-,; '$;": * Five issues werestated ;: ; and thVse t^ejury had to try. v ■;' ..-..■,.;". - r 1
The evidence was wholly matter of n!ot interesting detail ;- and most of it would be ■unintelligible if- published, because 'of its preference to ; plans;
John M'Gregor, G.E. and architect, produced his plans from, which/the build-ing-was erected. ": He was presenfrwhkit; ■the-memorandum of agreement wassigned: Before thai, the defendant-had* orally informed him what he would, require _tp have done in completing "the d-weliing-house. 'The defendant saw the plans several times before the. memory
,dum. was signed^ The x plans originally ysEpwed; threc r rpoms upstai^ frMifcrwere feed, afllaske^^b^fcha Thfei lower storey of:the t>reimiaea^as «y for> possession; beinetaken^onthesth;July, 1867;! and at that time; tlio franung of the partilipnsjfor the four upstairs rooms was being put tra ii the work' had- not been completed! "A:.^npboard^had? -also: a been^fitted up ma back room on the lower storey, which he (M^GregfoJ nnder-.stood--the- defendant -intended^ to useras a kitchen. Th&uppetparfoTOe'pre-^ mises was now in the same state as it was on the Ist September.. 7 Sft»ad«ertised for' tenders^ortheerection, of al^tchinpaff^ kn^dditionto the house? tended were' to-J© received: up to the 31si [December - W-^ c^act: was completed on the 31ss January. The contract price ; L 35; ;10s, and Ll ,0s "6d was paid for. ;;;He.understood, that there had been .delay to the kitchen, witV the" ns?? P *:?t% defendant-at all events. ' the.defen3anttold him that lie was willing' t-o wait -a twelvemonth for the Mtch^ &pd ;to (m iM'Qregor) r wr6te a' note-to thesplamtiff, to that effect/.. '■■.' V": r - : ) 3Vfr Biarton 'pbfeqted to the reception o£ •P^Jf-r.^i^PSr. Jn explanation of what was shown-to the architect by Dr Graw* ford," or as td'ithe'fixing ofrent. The agreement was one under thb 4th sectioi SMutecbf/Frauds,Cand was^insui&V : ;cient, and no parole evidence, in explanac;tipn,ofits.terms,.flpuid : be given, r.-•* v;; 1 miM a question: hereafter,,; present, we are only tmnff ;the issues stated. " .j^3ij cMriJarton agr^ec(^,^e; dxily wantect ito save Himself frdm any, objection here^ [aftery that he> ha* not objected to the re•ception of Buch evidgii^, ', s ' ' " " ; Mr : ;Mi<?reg^s;^mlnaiion continued* ,Thc^ defendants, sientv him-two-- lists.- afcUeast, of thingaha^eqtiireditd be done to 1 - 1 t 9^Q wai.rpceivedcin Augusk landon^on February 10th*. The latter [was headed, f What. is.necessary to >be done to premises, in Princes street, as per ■agreement.% Thelati^cqmprised— Four, jrpprns an^d lobby, io,j)e papered j- doorar •and wood-wprk,to : be; painted.oak;" water jlaid intp^i^he house ; ;r sink; ; and pipe, ta cany waste.^awayi, £oj)nial oven -m i l?W|n(V.yWft«ft 1 locks Repaired j.- water | closet to be removed, and, barrel, sunk- & i^ot^pa^d.J. drain in yard to be opened"" |up.:;; ;He (M'Gregor) sent the list-to th& IWup&gyiVfty- .a,;statement that the list|WMiiiß^telJigible i tp, i ;lmn. i fle^laiew" :nothing of such an agreement as.seemed |to be.referred fe. -None of the things in. ! the;listihadrbeenipointeai. out to him, by ; the defendant, before the signing of-the : memorandum of 'agreement.'-—• By 'yWt" \ Barton : Generally,;'he, considered the ; premises ~tp ,be tenauiable. ;.■ T kaewr ! nothing; whatever abipuit !the • R li^hpb3,,conlrap^^^' a bjaa^ ,mg, didnot;thinkthafewhen-^he left the i premises- ; the houa&v part was dfifc^fair occupation by a person in the p*cfsitioW*a£ the . defendant. -^ He? (Chisholm) was re-feriringT-to^September of last year;" fee would hot rtmdertake to say that the place waajaat tenantable £n.JMay. last« !I'.'2-. J_ 1. George: Dutch, carpenter^ whowasittie sP»ifiactpr :fer;a%)-kitchen^saidT-I ms, present at: an; interview betWe^n '{tfee plai«tiff?andithe-defendant^ in the plain.tiff's oflfice;'The plaintiff offered tp allpw the:defettdant, but ; 6f,rent, LTfbr pape^-ing-'theitupstairs a-ooms. The defendsat spoke of wanting the water; laid on; antL having some.plasteringdoneipn the wall opposite thftfoo^of Then, thav plaiiiMff^agreedH^-anpw 1 the defendants Lia ou^p|^e|^Me^fendan* |id^t& snakaiaD^ the plaipe'miialthe ajnderstahdingTthat th&- de~ fendant was to spend LlO as hepleasea. This interview was about a week before 1 completed 1 my contract, and; that was about the latter end of January; Baring the interview;1 the defendant objected to the position of the closet; Afterwards' he -said-to me, that if the closet was kep> for fii^family's iuse,:>it -would ]dpj;well enough,,,but ihat.it ; would not do*as tMngi then stood.—BylMr Barton: LlO wbnidbft safficientfoTpaperingtheroomswithapaper suitable to sucha building, for layingoit water, and plastenng, the bit of. wall. There was no proppsaL tha£ the plaiafifr should. >a Jlpw^Llo, and that the defendant should spend H2o.' t have no doubt ife would cost L3O to.do all that the defen.dant ta}ked;of doing ;; for he talked of Eain.i^Qg upstairs, and of other things, r contracted the closet, by direction of the plaintiff,' without any plans;/ The closet is under the outer part of the kitchen.-— Ite-ezsmiried : ;lt~is fust where one stood before the; fire. Jt was^hen in the. yard, which is ' n6w covered by "the ?kTtcsLeij. Beforethefire, as now,' Mr Tbleld occupied the shop adjoining tbat of the defendant.- ■:
W. Tofield, watchmaker, and Charles Henry Street, -land- agent and valuator^ wejrejeach examined and cross-examined, at "TIE ; Siree^stete& the circumstances under which he" gave notice to proceed to value for rent, whiefe he did ultimately in"the absence: of Mr Q^g^^He first-estimated L6O. as a fair rental, on a five years,' tenancy^ taxes and present and future, to be paid rhy- the tenant. .He found; afterwards .that, he had gone- beyond the reference-bond in the matter o£ rates- and^ taxes ; and afterwards, h& estimated the rental of the upper part of the building, and the kitchen, at Ll 63 a week, on the. basis -of a tenancy for fiva years, commencing from" the "Ist July. When,he,,was valuing,, the defendant was present, Mid complained as to the floors. .Hel(Sireet) admitted that the. floors were rather roughly laid ;r and the defendant did not make any. other complaint. Tha waHs; wanted papering, undoubtedly ; biife that' Tie (Street) understood the;plaint£!£ to have agreed to: do." He did not notice that anything else was necessary to maka such a building fairly tenantable.
Daring Mr, Street's evidence, Mr Bais ton asteS "questions leading to evidence of;W.fresh 1 or, a .modified agreement.—MeMacassej: .pbje.cltei.r-The;Judge "th<j*tghfe the evidence-not "admissible. The* cas» had been several times before him, bui* he had before heard anything to lead 'httn to suppose that it was;; at Igllj disputed that the signed docu— inept was the '.-. agreemenL—llr. Bartoit ;;s^id the case only came into his '^andslon Saturday ; so that .he was not ; to; anticipate all the eviden.ee. H& f should be contentif a note was taken that •he had tendered evidence: ia N yariatipi^c:i: the —The Judge sai3;t&M;liat vwould take such a note. .--' V^;^
. ;John Scanlan, oil and color merchaiot, •made an .estimate in December, of which hehad his then made pencil; memorandum^ It' was—Paperang. parlor, L 2 10a; twosmall bedrooms, iJt 4s; ceilings, lA ; staircase, LI 6s; and something which, he could not now f read or jremember, LI i •total,, L^. He would have underiikea the work for that sum. , The staircase was to be colored only. He did not da the'work.
■ rjJofcn--Logan,- the plaintiff, stated— A. ifoHiiighi or three weeks before the agreement- was signed, the defendant called upWme about the iiouse part o£ this building; and the conversation betweea. ■us resulted in my telling, him to. go to^aa architect, and to point otit how he woul&. like to have the upper storey divia^^
Sefora I was consulted again, the work traa in progress; and when the agreement "Was signed, it was understood between-us that the plans fully carried out the defendant^ wishes.; * 'After'the agreement Was -signed,, the, defendant spoke of having a servant's: room erected over the kitchen ; but-I objected to any such thing, because it Woiildall have to come down, when I built bn.the land at the back.. The kitchen was not-commenced sooner, because I told the defendant that T should' probably build on the. backTahd in.'about-!a year^ 'and that then •he could have a kitchen, , or.. any.; other rooms he liked.; (He '. told •me that lie VpAild ixoi want the kitchen for a twelvemonth^ When the erection of the. Mtclien'as, it now is was proposed, I pointed out. .that;.it. would take the light trom the1 consulting room; -and he distiflctiy said .that it • did not matter.^-H [The witness detailed..what. passed ;be- i ■•tweeh himself and the- defendant; in the; presence of Dutch. -rr-Mr Barton; pbjectecl j to the evidence as tending to vary the | iheniorandum of agreement, or to set np; a r substituted; agreemehti-i^The Judge; .thought,the evidenceadnii«ssibM.] .Inthe; presence of pntcit, I said to the^defendant, over .and' 6ver':agaih; that, as far' •as thei agree'meht was .'concerned, I had; done everythihgrequired-by-!it.'< The defendant, as to the papering, urged that,; if T<4°n,e at' once,!!h6thirig. more, of, thej •kind, would be required during the ten-; '•ascfcyi' '] I said that as, before the kitchen; was begun, I had to allow him^LTj ijout-of: rent for the, papering, lie might; ystin expend that. sum. He. urgedl'a gbodl "many things as necessary tpi b,e,'dprie;byj :3iim^ and when; I said that he .might spend; -XilO;oufcX)f;rent,,ha went away>in capital1 iiemper/ I Kad..said,.as-to the.LTjthai the defendants 'ntvwt - uhdelcstand that I was, in no way. bound Jo/a^ow.the. money. ~rjrjpp^ witness w^ upon. a number of ietters^^hich^wjere read;]" r ■ Jt r being, after; half-pasjt/;four,, o'clock when the plaintiff's examination-ih-chief was conclude.d.,: the Gpurt, was,adjourned until ten o'clocls:'to-day'(Thursday). \
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT18680910.2.11
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 2059, 10 September 1868, Page 2
Word Count
2,044SUPREMECOURT CIVIL SESSION. Otago Daily Times, Issue 2059, 10 September 1868, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.