THE SALEYARDS QUESTION.

Oamaru Mail, Volume XXXI, Issue 8834, 14 July 1905, Page 1

THE SALEYARDS QUESTION.

Sir, ..|| i:, well known we coihliiclihl c^^B negotiations with the .lunctioii Suleyn'^H Association lessees on behalf of the .Nol^H (Hugo Farmers' Cooporiilivu AsHO^ja^^^l the icpi^^^^H we rccci\4^^^^^l them to dm, which we send herewil^^^^H deference that ropiest iilsn^^^^H copy our letter I the .1 miction Ic^^^^H solicitors breaking oil ni'golintiouu^^^H which Idler we lime to say We luiVC^^^H till tin' present receded no reply. l^^^H you oblige be publishing the corrcup^^^H enec.-Ut are, AM) HllM'i;^! "Onmiirii, N.Z., duly, JUO^^H • 1 >,,,!■ Mis, Seeing t 1 Hit the lortHl'Oß the , limit em Yard'., in their deuce to he Press, refer to 'many able stall mclits,' and say, 'No much bei'ii hint 'd as to our point ion in to the sal'vards ipieslion"; I 1 liinU if be well, ill older to lei Hie public lor themselves as to the manner my elation has been Healed during our > lu tialions to join with them in Helling at, said yards,' lor vou to Kindly publish copy of your letter to the r,olicitnrs of Junction' Yards lessees, dated Ist ulnog with this. "Yours faithfully, "(Signed) .1. Maiti.anh Jones, "MunngcrlH "Messrs Hislop and (Jreagh, Solicitors, "Dear sirs, - Hi' Ibo .Inn. I ion The N.O.F, Co operative meeting of directors yesterday, tlie several reports we have hud Dominion make to them since they huil their meeting, when Ihe sell led draft before I hem. ,^H "tlur dienls feel that the Junction sees have not net them in that which at I be incept ion of the they led us to believe I hey cut crliuncd.j^M "From the lirsl, when our eliclils mated their willingiie.su to return vour clients have acted ill a petty and 'fair manner am I have assumed an and dictatorial altitude. "The Hoard fell very indignant tit positive and unreasonable demand made Mr Kose lor an alteration in the after the same bad been passed by all lies ami engrossed for signal lire, and at the breach ol' faith on Hie part of clients in publishing e uilideiil i.al coiTcspo^H "11. is fliereforu aliiii: I .i. . a i.lli^H the .Inn.'lion lessees " • "^H low our clients to n". . ' h,^| Yard:; as one id thci ..h.i^H understanding the ncg ■ "■■■"• h'Oie^^H Such being so, our l n.dvi^H that if is futile lo fit'.. ' • ■!>■' n^H got ial ions. "Wo ba.ve many i.pee.ilie grievanc.UH eoinplain of, am.nig which are the i'ollm^H "I. All ,'irt'iingemeuf wan made that V^H si hi be allowed lo join ill Hie Juilcfil^H tii-itl ol' lease on e.puil 11 lam;, provided repetition ol' Hie 11 hies of the past. COIU^H reasonably be prcveiilcd. Subseipielltl^H this airai'ige nl win- denied by Mr Hoh^^H and only admillcd by him when our tenliihi 'on the point'wan conlirined by Morris. Vet, nolwil hsliiiidiug your refused lo allow il lo lie a. term of till! HR^H '•[>. Your clients thought lit to dicfiifn our Association Hie leiiini upon should e.milucl ils business by act unlly pulaling thai il should ill future linn.- ::iviii..'; its usual bonus to - a stipulation Hud had never obtained pr^M "5. At Ihe last niomenl, im already me^H lioned after evcrylhing had been tlnal^H liasscil. Mr Hose 'inilsleil upon a ni.atori^^B ailcralioi'i, which was direcflv opposed the .'irr.'iimcmenls previously Hindi), an clearly shown by the draff ngroumnnf nr^H by Hie corn ispondeiice, and he persisted lids demand, although informed by Y<">^H nelves I hill he was not entitled to tJll^H t.he stand he <lid. "This stipulation, as well as the utiwa^^H ranlable claii,,e. dealing wilh our elienl^H bonuses was onlv willidr.'iwn when. ynt^H clienls had reason lo fear Ihey had OVij^H stepped Hie mark. ''Under- all ein uinslaiicos, wo must *>^M wo are not surprised at the decision °^M clients h.'i.ve come to. "Vours faithfully, „^| (Signed) Lr.i', and (Ikavh.

To tin- Editor. ■■ Sir —Wlion 1 read Mr llurlmry » loltHß] in last night's Mail, l-illlo L<»rd Faimllor<B_| c",,," inlo niv mind, and all I could H'H was. "Well, 'l'm jiggered!" ■■ I alii, eto., ... HH VERB BAV.H ,lu!y loth, 1905. Hip Kir---"Jell'" and 1 nnml, jiwl. nßren differ'mi some lliingM, anil an my intention was not lo "liter inlo <\ I>"".H discussion bill lo pi"','" certain POllltH |',„v our fanners, havine; done Hub 1 will leav" mat leva where they are, tepli^H Villi duly, 1905. lh.' Kdilor. Sir -l'pnnit mo just lo miy in refwoi^B („ Mr M.-iilland Jones' Idler in last nigl^H Mail thai lh" agree nl, in (|Uentioll , V>^H lin.-illv approved of by hiu soliei'lor on 9lh .Inn", mid iln hiil)se.|ii")illv admilled by 111" that no oiieslioii reuardiug alloralioll the lei-ins was raised after that dale, thai nut until Ist -tulv did their write to our solicitor withdrawing from _■ rluiiniuin .liinelii.n Vimls I.esseesßMj (liunarii, Kill duly. 190.'.. ■■