Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISTRICT COURT.

(Before hia Honor Judge Waul.) EANKKLIt'o'V. Ia re John lor.kt:.—The debtor tubtlitted himself fi.r pu'otic examination; s»t,iS no one appeared to f-r.amine him, io Honor declared the examination clcsad. Ia re Charles Mills.—The debtor was oiled for public c:\:.ni;::r.'!.'-n, hue did not irpear, and hi 3 lio: or struck the case :w. In re Michael Murphy.— Itlr Newton lppoared for the Au'uneo to mere for an wj arnmeat ot the public examination of tie debtor. itr 0 Meagher appeared for the debtor. _ Mriiereton stated, the reasons for.askn; for an sojournment were, that as the debtors examination before the Assignee ®'y ciosed yesterday the Assignee had »« had time to make his report, that Js case was a v-jry complicated one, a-jd tiers trere ctrc':ni: t mcio in c.-.rinec'ion wltte debtor's conduct in aß.il tile ever ir.s pr-. pt.rry. including an Qfiesj nhie.i had been buujht only a ?*prevtotis io the re itioii btiui; ™,nr,ich he though' would load bis aocor to consider the debtor gnihy of a ®w=ta«aaor. The- debtor had not vet a complete tatomcnt of his pros"r, aaaiming as his - c-"='-!i for not J- 1 "? so that Messrs M'Conneil a'.d of Chrb'chtirch, v.lio «ie ua ageita, had not rendered a statcct accounts. • -J' intimated that the had .repeatedly applied io ilossrh ° i sne '' a, 'd D-uylas for these acbnt without ttiecc so far. 6 . ,t:03 Ea ''i he did not l:no-v (J^;^ rtr - or<i would be anytiiiug for tile when these aceonr.t3 were

J?® Honor said the recounts would E 7!; >bs '"«'.aaa if Messrs M ; Conncll , . oajlM rofii;ed to s;nd them the aw W Caj " c ' ca 'l on them to aliovr [ or no; doi'nL; so. exmitnnti.jn wjs adjourned h f'-.o l-kh of April. SeJl n-1 3 ' —-^ r Crawford, for &itTi-„~°it a: " d Crc "2 h > '"-M'-'-" f -- r O<HcW Ass -- n£Bl,l —Ttto dehvir was cISP L ' Jtami!,ld, - B ' * Lich waa Heaury and Turner.—Eis Honor "* ftilfr \''' *i : ' :C P"'°"' c examination Hi'-p" 1 %' s - I>;s->a—:>lr Crawford, for sppliad f,r c:>sts for 10 re;it;oi;ingcr>;diicrs.--JlrtTU, , Qf i. .!"»i £ Cl -jJ-1 Aw 5A - Sjeaj* ?f'7> r 'i for t'.:c dob tor'« l ' r i; a3 1:0 papers wre tiled, 1 - ad 3 ,>ura his a rr u - u >--vt. (i;-v, L> w . 1 : -".Vi:\Tr!. re tr& r-r* i ■ »- - hi, n ' lVr3 - oi '-- a;: " Wr Do " or CTv-icl prr-fcate t»> 1 V, n --i ;rul '« Ar.:ir;-v c.ray. t ? 0 - I«kw of ad-, = ?ra: ".s" l f - anl lLri '% lor and : Ussa. Reared to move iu tho above

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OAM18850331.2.15

Bibliographic details

Oamaru Mail, Volume IX, Issue 2865, 31 March 1885, Page 3

Word Count
417

DISTRICT COURT. Oamaru Mail, Volume IX, Issue 2865, 31 March 1885, Page 3

DISTRICT COURT. Oamaru Mail, Volume IX, Issue 2865, 31 March 1885, Page 3