Same Fraud Under New Name?

NZ Truth, Issue 1030, 22 August 1925, Page 4

Same Fraud Under New Name?

There has been a lot of wondering m Auckland as to what the exact result will be of the cpst|y and protracted Diindas Mackenzie case. The verdict of' the Appeal Court confirmed the striking -off from the medical register of the Abrams expert, but he still advertises m the press that he may be consulted as a "Homeopathic" and Abrams machinist. Are our laws for the. protection of the public health such that a medical practitioner found by the Appeal Court to have "frightened without pity" his suffering patients, and that one helpless woman "was deliberately defrauded of her money and tricked in.the most impudent manner," can merely remove his shingle claiming the right to practice as a qualified medico and substitute one calling himself a homeopathic and Abrams electronic expert? ■ ...■■; • ■ |f so, our Supreme Court would seem to waste a lot of benzine m crushing a butterfly on aw heel after which the diurnal insect promptly emerges into fuller activity m the nocturnal shades of quackery as an unrecognised moth.