WAS WHOLE STORY TOLD?
“AUSTEN’S DOUBTFUL VICTORY’? AMERICAN PRESS SCEPTICAL Australian and N.Z. Cable Association. (Received March 26, 8.5 p.m.) NEW YORK, March 26. The newspapers generally regard Sir. Austen Chamberlain’s vindication as a hollow victory, except the “New York Times,’’ which saye Sir Austen did much to blow away the suspicion which had gathered around what was done at Geneva. Little by little the whole atmosphere of doubt and suspicion, which was artificially created, has been cleared up. The “New York Herald-Tribune,” on the contrary says: “Sir Austell Chamberlain won a parliamentarytriumph, but the pruMio is as baffled as it was before Mr Lloyd George attempted to probe the mystery.” The “Morning Herald” says: “It is probable that even within the Unionist Party some doubt exists as to whether the whole story has* been told.”
The “Evening World,” heading its leader, “Sir Austen’s Doubtful victory,” says: "His speech was more wordy than weighty.’*
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19260327.2.75
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12406, 27 March 1926, Page 5
Word Count
154WAS WHOLE STORY TOLD? New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12406, 27 March 1926, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.