Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GISBORNE SENSATION

MERCHANT AND “DOPE”- CASE. ! NOW SUED FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. An echo of the sensational dofce case heard at Gisborne in June of last year, was heard at the 'Magistrate’s Court when -Martin , James Carr proceeded, against George. Clare, claiming - £2OO for alleged malicious prosecution. The original case was one in which ■■lvy-' Bell Garr (schoolmistress) sued Lionel George Clare (merchant) for £SOOO on a charge of criminal assault, alleging that Clare had taken her to Iris house,- doped af drink and behaved improperly while she was unconscious. After a trial.lasting three full days the jury awarded her £ISOO. A sensational feature of the case was the arrest during the trial of plaintiff’s husband, Martin James Carr, on a private information alleging false pre-, tenees. Carr, for whom the police were searching, was brought into court, and was arrested as soon as- he out of the witness box. Counsel for Mrs Carr ’ contended that the arrest was merely a “stunt” to discredit, plaintiff in the eyes of the jury, and that the -false pretences charge would never be gone on with. Carr,was later on the charge and found'not guilty. - The present action arises by reason of that verdict. , 1 When the case was called this week, Mr Coleman, solicitor for: defendant, "said, a motion had been filed for the case* to -be removed to the Supreme Court, and suggested, a sine die adjournment, which Was granted. The case may he heard at the coming ses*' fliou, but will probably be postponed) until the June sitting.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19250302.2.63

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Times, Volume LII, Issue 12076, 2 March 1925, Page 7

Word Count
256

GISBORNE SENSATION New Zealand Times, Volume LII, Issue 12076, 2 March 1925, Page 7

GISBORNE SENSATION New Zealand Times, Volume LII, Issue 12076, 2 March 1925, Page 7