THE CIVIL LIST

New Zealand Times, Volume L, Issue 11661, 27 October 1923, Page 5

THE CIVIL LIST

SUPREME COURT SESSIONS BIG CALENDAR OF CASES FOR HEARING. HEAVY DAMAGES CLAIMED. The Hon. Mr Justice Hosking sat in chambers yesterday for the purpose of settling the civil list, which is as follows : BEFORE SPECIAL JURIES. William Bannatyre and Company Ltd. v Francis D. Manquaie Garland and Edgar Garland (£12,840 9s od damages for alleged breaches of conditions and warranty). BEFORE JURY OF TWELVE. John Tollan v. The King", claim foi alleged negligence (£1926 11s 9d), Robert Scott Ferguson v. Frank Flipp, claim for damages. for negligence (.{.'508 16s 9cl), Mary Maxwell v. The King, alleged negligenee, claim for £2OOO. Samuel Freeborough Fjsher v. Lizzie McMillan, claim for balace due under agreement (£1250). John Arthur Connor v. Nelson Moato and Company, damages for alleged negligence (£1330). BEFORE COMMON JURY OF FOUR, Charles Stevens v. Florence Parkin and Harry Parkin, damages for alleged false representation (£400). Frederick Holmes v. Ernest. Mawson Earl Stevens, damages for alleged false representations (£400). Richard Crooks v. Patrick Corby and William Burns, damages for alleged negligence (£242 13s). BEFORE JUDGE ALON'E. A. L, Wicks, Ltd. v. Arthur Leslie Wicks, specific performance, and £5Ol damages and counter-claim. Hangitoio Estate Company, Ltd. and others v. German Mart™ Davenport, specific performance and £862 16s 5d for alleged occupation of lands. Counter claim of £BOO9, alleged breach of warranty. D. and George Scott v. Samuel Johnson Davenport, specific performance and £690 10a for alleged occupation of lands. Counter-claim of £BOOO for alleged breach of warranty. Public Trustee v. Arthur Fair (Crown Law' Office), probafo in solemn form. Charles James Futter v. Frederick He;;;-y Futter, specific performance. Albert Heni v Hunt v. 'Gladys Alma Lempriere and Cyril Bertram Lempriere. rescission and £225 18s damages. Counter-claim for specific performance. George Swensson v. F. W. Vare, decree as to partnership. Charles Herbert Treadwell and John Edward Hewitt v. Valentine Edmund Hitchings, £96 16s 8d as interest on mortgage. Jane Ann Douglas v. Cecelia Lodder and others, probate in solemn form, with counter-claim.

Herbert Eaton Radcliffe v. Emily Maude Radcliffe, £ISOO moneys received and accounts.

C. C. Wakefield and Company, Ltd. v. Albert Goodwill, injunction. Harold W. Blown and Company, Ltd. v. Robert C’ann, £323 commission, etc.

Thomas Whyte Young and others v. John Thomson and Thomas Thomson, £530 2s 2d principal allegedly due on promissory notes. Georgina Charlotte Frederica- Shute v. Charles Alexander Baker, aocounts.. etc.

Joseph George _ Holland v. Patrick Joseph Daly, possession of mare. Reginald Percy Bray v. Peter Robertson Russell, declaration.

Johanna Mary Vaney v. Henry James Wales, £IOO damages for alleged trespass and injunction. John James Boyd v. .Wellington City Corporation, declaration. Pero Patrick White and Walter Campbell White v. Ben Cunyard Warnes and Henry Warwick Stephenson, dissolution of partnership and accounts.

A. Hatrick and Company, Ltd. v. John Campbell, claim for £375 17s 6d and interest due on promissory notes. Edward Walsh and-Margaret Walsh v. Patrick Joseph O’Regan, declaration. James Reid v. the Victoria Laundry Company, Ltd., £SO and injunction. Annie" Deckst.on v. Ernest John August and Joseph Edward Westerby, possession, etc. Moris Domb v. Victor Fowler and Violet Fowler, possession, etc. A. Hatrick and Company, Ltd. v. King Brothers, claim for £BBO 14s 7d allegedly’ due on promissory notes, etc. George Frederick Anyan v. Petone and Lower Hutt Gas Lighting Board, claim for £268 9s damages for alleged negligence. Annie Kedclell v. Hilda Organ and Albert Organ, claim far £4CO damages for alleged false representation.

Florence Drummond v. Frederick Joseph Fanning, claim for £2OO lent.

Hart Spear v. Clara Rowlett and Annie Elizabeth Newham, removal of building and accounts.