CIVIL CASES
SUPREME COURT LIST. The list of cases to bo beard at the civil sessions of the Supreme Court, opening on Monday before Mr Justice Hosking, is as follows: Before His Honour and a Special Jury, Ramsay Maodougall v. James Weils Chapman, claim for £3OOO for alleged false representation. Before His Honour and a Common Jury of Twelve. William Henry Trengrove v. John McGill, £577 damages for seizure of, a motor-car; Jessie Aitchison v. the Wellington City Corporation, £IOOO damages for bodily injuries. Emmie Alary Graham v. Alice Merry, £ISOO damages for slander. Lucinda Caldwell v. the Union Steam Ship Company, Ltd., £2OOO damages for death of husband. Michael Sweeney v. Sidney Kirkcaldio and Elsie Kirkcaldie, ( £5Ol damages for injuries. Matthew Henry Oram v. Herman and Wigu Manufacturing and Contracting Company, Ltd., £506 for debt. Rehearings Before a Jury of FonrT. W. F. Macsden v, Harcourt and, Co., claim for conrmissioru Loo Wye v, Mackenzie, £248 fo* wages and counter-claim for £l5O for professional services rendered. Before His Honour and a Jury of Four. Bertram Archibald Booth v. the Union Steam Ship Company, Ltd.,, £SOO damages for bodily injuries. Fred Hague v. Norwich and London. Accident Insurance Co., £263 16s 7c? alleged to bo duo under a contract. Leonard James Paisloo v. Herbert Leicester, £260 7s damages for injuries. Before His Honour Alone. Hariana Natanahia v. the Public Trustee and Alexander James Toogood, application to set aside a transfer on. the ground of undue influence. Mary Dennison v. Albert Dcnniston Proud, application for a decree re property. Arthur Batchelor v. Sarah Thomas, claim for specific performance. Te Heu Heu Tukino v. James Joseph Moore, £450 due under an agreement. Bartolo Russo v. Georgina Ridgway, suit for injunction and £2O damages. Peter Francis Finlayson v. William Miller and William Johnston Brown, disselutioi ot partnership 'Alfred Walton Brailsford v. Walter Alexander Cathio and Violet Cathio, claim for £207 7s 8d on dishonoured promissory notes and interest. James Prouse and Richard Prouse v. the Matai Sawmills Co., Ltd., claim for £SOO for debt. W. Booth and Co., Ltd. v. David Morris Owens, claim for £224 for debt.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19140516.2.10
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 8734, 16 May 1914, Page 2
Word Count
355CIVIL CASES New Zealand Times, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 8734, 16 May 1914, Page 2
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.