PENDING DIVORCE ACTION

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7301, 3 December 1910, Page 1

PENDING DIVORCE ACTION

MOTION RESPECTING CO-RESPONDENTS. A question concerning a pending divorce case was heard ih‘ Chambers in the Supreme Court yesterday morning by' his Honor Mr Justice Chapman. A motion was moved by Mr "W. Perry on behalf of plaintiff in the case of 11. M. Rosenberg v. Ada Rosenborg (action for dissolution of marriage), for leave; to dispense with tho filing of names of corespondents in i respect to the proceedings. Mr Perry explained that.the petition had already been filed without the names of corespondents. , , Hia Honor: It is a charge of prostitution? Mr. Perry; Yes, your Honor, that'is what it amount<s to.

His Honor: You do not say that it is impracticable to mention the names, of tho. corespondents. . Mr Perry: The difficulty .is this: From what petitioner tolls me I doubt whether ho has enough evidence to prove adultery against any. particular person,, but, he has evidence to the effect, that the house is' being improperly conducted. - His Honor: I think you had better, state that, fact in an affidavit, and amend tho petition by making.it. a charge. Ton speak in your, petition of respondent loading an immorallifc, but that must bo with some particular individual. ■ You .shouldamend the petition," speaking of ! it Immoral life as a prostitute. 1 Leave was . granted , for dispensing with* the filing of names of co-respondents in the action. ~ . .