SUPREME COURT

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7139, 28 May 1910, Page 7

SUPREME COURT

CIVIL LIST FIXED.

! The cases for hearing at the coming session w.ere arranged as follows yesterday by Ill's Honor the Chief Justice, sitting jn chain hers : | ILfor,o a Judge Alone.

| Tuesday, May 31—James Alexander Hannah ‘v. Charles Nadine, claim for . sjucihc performance. Thursday, Juno 2 Emily Prosser v. Ilia Ocean Accident Uuarantee Corporation. Ltd., claim for .TITO on insurance police: Henry Hastings Cramp v. : Charles Edwin Waters, claim for JB2OO ; lor goods sold, etc. I Saturday Juno 1 - Ferdinand Spencer 1 Easton aid Barbara Ellen Austin v. : John Hainboiv Stausull, claim for i cctilication of agreement i Monday, June o—Garnet Hyland Milne I v, Charles John Oliveciona, accounts, i etc. Tuesday, June 7—Alfred James Skinner v, James AlcGuinness, claim for J;2Ki 8s Oil, duo under , u contract. Wednesday, June B—Grenville8 —Grenville v.. Parker, rent, etc. Sargood, Sun and Ewen v. Hello JJradloc. claim lor A2i!o for goods sold, etc. (prdvisionalj. Thursday, .Tunc o—Karl Pasmussen v. Edith Dorothy EULs and. John Eli Ellis, claim for inj unction, etc. Before a Judge and a Special Jury of Twelve. Monday, Juno 13th, to Wednesday, Juno Join —Margaret Armiss v. the Wellington Harbour Perries Ltd., claim for AlaiW damages (loss of liio on Duco). Tiuusdfiy, June Kith, ct sccp—Kuima. Selistroni v. the Wellington Harbour Ferries, Ltd., claim for JC7M damages (loss of life on JJuco). Xo dehuitc fixture was made for the following cases: — Timotny U’A'eill and others v. the Commercial Union Assurai/cc Co., Ltd., claim tor thJIUO,' due under an insurance policy. William Sinclair v. Hugh 1 rasor and James Alexander Eraser, claim for AH32 7s under an agreement."Wellington Steam Ferry Co., Ltd., v, the Commissioner of Taxes, claim for J.-3-H Ms, overpaid tax. Mr Samuel on behalf of the plaintiff company, mated that it had been agreed that the Solici-tor-General should, state a case, DIVORCE. All divorce cases have been fixed for June 10th. In none of the cases set down for trial-before a jury will a jury be now required, by consent of the parties. The whole of the following cases will’therefore be taken before a judge alone :—William Arnntago v. Lulh Armitage; Ethel May Lodge v. Leonard Stanmor.a Lodge; Sarah Calder v. Alexander Cal dor; Hannah Hirgitte Kirstme Anderson v. Ola -nuersou; Christina Hobbs v. Leonard Alexander Hobbs; Isabel May Mathesom Mackuy v. George ■William Lincoln. 3tackay; Lmily Victoria Firth v. Arthur William George Plrth; James McGrath v. Annie MeGrath; Agnes Mary Dawson. Welsh r. Ralph Herbert. Dawson Welsh; Anmo Gamble v. Robert Gamble; Chailcs Edwin Major v. Julia Sarah Major (judicial separation); Julia Sarah Major v. Charles Edwin Major (judicial separation).