Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PREFERENTIAL RATES

LOXU-i/ISTANCE OOAL FREIGHTS. WEST. COAST MDJEOWNERS COMPLAIN. A deputation representing tho West Coast colliery owners waited on-the Minister for Railways (Hon. J- A. Millar) yesterday afternoon with a new to so-curing that all classes of Now Zealand coal shall be carried on the railways at the same rate, instead of allowing a largo preferential rate tobrown, coals and lignites';: a« compared' with" the bituminous' coals of the West Coast. , It -was pointed out to the Minister that the long-distance freights on tho xespioctire classes ~of coal gradually divorsed as the distance increased, so that the lignite from the Taupirl mine, for inetanoe, could he carried j to Now Plymouth, a distance of 330 miles, at about five .shillings per ton loss' than.' -would 'he charged for tho carriage of bituminous' coals over a similar distance. The opening of tho Main Trunk line enabled coal from the. Ta'upiri distriot to be sent into - the towns of Taranaki, Wairarapa, aud Hawke's Bay, districts which previously- drew their supplies from this West Coast collieries. Tho deputation suggested ■-that as t tho lignite minoowners were-.. able to rail their■ooal straight from the mine to the consumer, the bituminous coalmine owners were under an additional handicap 'besides that of preferential [freights, inasmuch -as thoy were, [obliged to rail the coal to the ship, [ and- then .convey, St by sea to another port, when.it might be again handled on the railway. Tho bituminous owners, the-V stated, obtained a lower .price -forvtijejir., coal than tho lignite owners at'the''pit's mouth, and tho higher /price. t of \- bituminous to tb& consumer was* Sue to tho greater cost of The de* tmtation urged '.that if the _ rates on! ugnite,', w©reV:',- r -.nnremuherative. that class of co^.should .be required to pay moToV-b-ut'if; '"tm'-'tHie other hamd the rates were payable, bituminous coals should not be required to bear a heavier impost. Orie of the speakers was a Wanganui merchant.■ who stated that:th©,. \Va/Dsan-ai i Harbour ; Board had lost-considerably, by the reduced wharfage receipts i%aauaed by;- lessoned importations'of " West Coast ooal. He was; of cqSßs<mT fliat the-;'original purpose of the proferemtiar rate, that of encouraging. the-development of aw inferior olass of icoal, was not now justified by the conditions. Tho Minister was asked : if at any rato ho would confine tho operation of the preferential freight for lignite to an area of, say, - seventy-five miles, beyond which all local coals should, .hear th-o samo hsuilage ralbes. ..In his. roplyiJjho, Minister demonirbrated that fee was ifuUy. versed in tho facts of the ease. He stated that the i»riff was now under consideration, and Awhile -he could not see his way) clear to go asfar as tho deputation! suggested, h© believed •that -the special rates on Tignites over long distances could stand Borne revision. The matter would recedve very careful consideration before being finally determined. ....

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19100316.2.78

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7078, 16 March 1910, Page 9

Word Count
472

PREFERENTIAL RATES New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7078, 16 March 1910, Page 9

PREFERENTIAL RATES New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7078, 16 March 1910, Page 9