THE RIGHT TO WORK
FOE FitEE LABOURERS REPRESENTATION ON WAGES BOARD. REMARKS BY A JUDGE. By Telegraph—Press Association— Copyrielit. (Received March 14, 11.15 p.m.) SYDNEY, March 14. The Industrial Court to-day granted a claim by the Free Labourers' Association to he represented on the Wages Board. The "Wharf Labourers' Union strongly opposed the application. Judge Beydon, in granting the request, said ho thought it very singular that the dismissal of free labourers at th© central wharf a fortnight ago was rendered possible by the fact that the Act contained no provision protecting non-unionists against such treatment. Had unionists been dismissed because they were unionists, instead of non-unionists being dismissed because they were non-union-ists, the employers would have been liable to penalties aggregating £3OOO. If the right to work was not a right which the law should protect it was hard to Bay what was. To be a nonunionist was not an offence against the law. He was afraid strong feeling would be aroused, but he had come to the conclusion that the free labourers' claim must be conceded.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19100315.2.56
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7077, 15 March 1910, Page 7
Word Count
178THE RIGHT TO WORK New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7077, 15 March 1910, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.