Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HARBOUR BOARD MATTERS

fTd'ths Editor " N.Z. Times.’’). . T Sir,—Of dirte w-e li’ave seen in the public press >OlllO, mild 'criticism of. our Harbour it has:been:for the good, of, the board.and public. If the, board’s methods had received healthy criticism in the past, we should not liave seen such 'huge blunders mVjdo: for instance, the King’s wharf. Where the“board ..could berth only ' one' direct liner, and then'lay the .structure ■ tip’for altciutians. This is only one-of many which-lias caused the hoard a.n annual ‘deficit, blit the worst feature of it is the; action of'the board in reducing their employees’ 'wages to help maim good thp annual'loss. T understand .that some time agb' the employees; petitioned, the board/fo-r 'a sn.uil increase of .wages, aril obtained ah extra"4d per day all: round. Thus permanent employees'.received an increase from’ 8s to 8s C-d; .second storemen, froip 8s Ifld to 9s 2d; first storemen., .fitjln, 9s;;: 2d to 8s <kl; and head 'storemen, froin 9s ,6d to ,9s lOd; ’and so oh, according to grade. Tlie'public will readily' see it. is r not a 'princely , wage considering, .the*'responsibility ‘ of ' their positions. But now weicbmo ,‘to' the fact of the board reverting back, to the old rate-of .‘pay, and the permanent men are asked to act* as storemen, without 'storemen’s pay. and. When they . ‘asked for storemen's x-Uy,'. only received the- old rati,of Ss.lCdi 'Another instance: A store where the storeman, used ,to';get. Os .10d, a chains' Was jihade, ithe next; man , getting 8s Cd. ! .Very soon another change took place, dhe next man. receiving. ta.St: Ndw thequestion arises,is .'the board throwing put a feeler to see how- its employees take it, with- the object of reverting to the old rate? Of course, the permanent employees have not got the. protection of a - union, but it uppears the board, is. not ikeeping faith with its men in. reducing the; small increase of some time back.; 1 do not believe.» paid official: of the boai-d would take the'responsibility of such a drastic step without the full consent of the Harbour Board.—l am. etc.. AN OBSERVER. Srtitoun, January 13th.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19100117.2.11.2

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7028, 17 January 1910, Page 3

Word Count
350

HARBOUR BOARD MATTERS New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7028, 17 January 1910, Page 3

HARBOUR BOARD MATTERS New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7028, 17 January 1910, Page 3