Page 37 Advertisements Column 3

New Zealand Mail, Issue 1201, 8 March 1895, Page 37

A Beautiful Complexion. —Apply Sulpholine Lotion. It drives away pimples, blotches, roughness, redness, and all disfigure, ments. Sulpholine develops a lovely skin. Is bottles. Made in London. —Advt. It is probable that Constable Griffiths will go to Palmerston North in place of Acting-Detective Bishop, who was recently ordered there* « Powder ” destroys Bugs, Fleas, Moths, Beetles, and all other insects, whilst quite harmless to domestic animals. In exterminating Beetles the success of this powder is extraordinary. It is perfectly clean *in application. See the article you purchase is ‘‘Keating’S'’ as, imitations are noxious and ineffectual, Sold in tins, 6,d, Is, and 2s fid each by all chemists. Application has been made to the Government to exempt one of the lying-in homes of the Colony from the operation of the Infant Life Protection Act. We understand that the Government, while recognising that the motives of the applicants were quite proper—one being to avoid qyen the minimum of publicity entailed bjf the Act —felt that they qavfld pot interfere with thq opayafcon ef tfie law by making ahY e^ce^tiops.

TO THOMAS ASHTON OB HIS BEHBESENTATIVES, KJRSTIA to an ord;er in the High Court o| Justice, Chancery Division, dated November, 1894, and made in the matter e tr.usts of an indenture dated the 7th day of February, 1848, and made between Mary Ann Ashton of the one part and Richard Ashton, Qeorge Williams and Robert Goddard Jobes of the other part. Between Herbert K'ilby, plaiptiff, and Ernest Ashton, defendant, 1894, A., 1442, an enquiry was directed inter alia whether Thomas Ashton mentioned in the said indenture, dated the 7th day of February, 1848,, is Jiving or dead or ought to, he presumed to be dead, and if dead, when he died, or if he ought to be presumed to be dead, then at and from what date ought such presumption to have been entertained, and whether, if dead or to be presumed to he dead, he died or- ought to be presumed to have died without leaving issue and whether or not intestate. The said Thomas Ashton was the son of Thomas Knight Ashton, of Morden Terrace, Lewisham road, in the County of Kent, and nephew of Richard Ashton and John Ashton, He was born on the 18th day of September, 1834, and went to New Zealand shortly after coming of age, the last place at which he was heard of was Cruickshanks’, Upper Hutt, Wellington, New Zealand, where his brother Henry Thomas Ashton was working in 1872, and he left that place some years previous to the last date. . . The said Thomas Ashton, if living, or his representatives, if deceased, are on or before the 23rd day of May, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-five, either in person or by their solicitor or solicitors to come in and establish their claims at the Chambers of Mr Justice Chitty, at the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, England, or in default thereof they will he peremptorily excluded from the benefit of any order which may be made in such enquiry. Tuesday, the 11th day of June, 1895, at 11 o’clock in the said Chambers, is the day, hour and place appointed for hearing and adjudicating upon the said claims, if any. Dated the 24th day of January, 1895. C. BUREY, Chief Clerk. W. H. Smith & Son, Gresham House, Old Broad street, London, England. FladntifTs Solicitors, 885