THE CRAWFORD-DILKE CASE.
By Eleotbio Telegraph.—Copyright.
(reuter’s telegrams.)
London, July 22.
In the Crawford-Dilke divorce suit, Captain Forster has given evidence admitting that he had committed adultery with the respondent (Mrs Crawford). The evidence for both sides has' now closed. During an address to-day by the counsel for the petitioner, Sir Charles Dilke three times interrupted, and protested energetically against statements made by the counsel as to his (Sir Charles’) alleged adultery. London, July 23. In the Crawford divorce suit the juily has returned a verdict to the effect that the Queen’s Proctor has failed to establish his case, and the decree of divorce pronounced by M r Justice Butt in January last was confirtned.
(special tO united press association.) London, July 25. irhe Times and many other newspapers demand that Sir Charles Dilke should be prosecuted for perjury.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZMAIL18860730.2.75
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Mail, Issue 752, 30 July 1886, Page 24
Word Count
139THE CRAWFORD-DILKE CASE. New Zealand Mail, Issue 752, 30 July 1886, Page 24
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.