THE CRAWFORD-DILKE CASE.

New Zealand Mail, Issue 751, 23 July 1886, Page 25

THE CRAWFORD-DILKE CASE.

By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright.

(beuteb’s telegrams.)

London, July 16.

The divorce suit Crawford versus Crawford and Dilke is now being reheard by the Court. Sir Charles Dilke gave his evidence to-day, and positively denied the alleged adultery. London, July 18.

In the divorce suit, Crawford v. Crawford and Dilke, evidence has been given by servants in favor of the co-respondent, but the latter has made certain damaging admissions. London, July 19.

In the divorce suit, Crawford v. Crawford and Dilke, the evidence of experts has shown that the handwriting of the several anonymous letters received by Mr Crawford were similar to that of the respondent, Mrs Crawford. Mrs Rogerson has testified to having received a confession of adultery from Sir Charles Dilke.

(special to united press association.)

London, July 18. Sir Charles Dilke has admitted that there were indiscretions in his conduct some eleven years ago, but he denies every accusation of familiarity with Mrs Crawford. His mother and servants give detailed accounts of his every-day movements. The woman Fanny, whose name was brought up at the trial in the Divorce Court, is still absent from London.