GOAL ACHIEVED
SECURITY FOII FARMERS THE HON. P. FRASER'S CLAIM GREAT BENEFITS BESTOWED [BY TELEGRAPH' —PRESS ASSOCIATION] DUNEDIN, Thursday Defence of the Government's guaranteed price system, together with criticism of tlie compensatory prico proposal put forward by the Opposition, was made by the Minister of Kducation, the Hon. P. Fraser, during his address last night. "Opponents of the Government's guaranteed price," Mr. Fraser said, "want to use it to stir up the animosity of the farmers who have benefited from it. The guaranteed prico is opposed by the Opposition, and was opposed by the last Government. Indeed, Mr. Coates went into astronomical figures to show the enormous cost it was going to be to the country, his figure being in the vicinity of £200,000,000. In the-face of actuality that sort of thing is too foolish. The farmers have benefited to an enormous extent. \ "Opponents Angry" " The reason why the Government brought forward the guaranteed price was that, owing to the vast fluctuations in the price of primary produce, there was nothing but iincertainty. When prices rose, land speculation became rife, and mortgage rates were high. Then prices fell and farmers were so encumbered that many were in danger of having to walk off the land. Then the Government stabilised prices. "One of the most surprising things is the resentment shown at the action of the Government in stating that the surplus of £600,000 in the Dairy Industry Account from the past year s operations of the guaranteed price system would go back to the dairy farmers this year. Our opponents are angry. Although they had previously complained that we were denying the farmer his rights, they are also angry because we have promised that, if they are so willing, the farmers will have a properly representative tribunal to fix the guaranteed price next year. Mr. Hamilton's Warning "Mr. Hamilton speaks 'with two voices on this matter," Mr. Fraser added. "He said on one occasion that for years he had acknowledged the justice of a compensating price, but last year at Invercargill he said he had warned farmers against it because it was dangerous in theory and likely to be disastrous in practice." After briefly explaining the history of the compensatory price proposal, Mr. Fraser went on to say that there had so far been no explanation of it, and there was not likely to bo any. He was sorry to see that Mr. W. W. Mulholland, president of the New Zealand Farmers' Union, was so anxious to prejudice the farmers against the Government, and that a reputedly non-poli-tical bodv was attacking the Government with any weapons, one of which was to get people to go round the country talking about a compensating price, which was nothing more or less than opposition to tariffs. "The fact remains," Mr. Fraser concluded, "that for the first time in the history of this country, the dairy farmers have security, an assured income, reduced mortgages and stabilised rates of interest."
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19380624.2.194
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXV, Issue 23072, 24 June 1938, Page 16
Word Count
495GOAL ACHIEVED New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXV, Issue 23072, 24 June 1938, Page 16
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.