EXCHANGE OR BONUS?
Sir, —The Dairy Commission's report is -remarkable in that it completely opposes by implication the most vital recommendation of the Monetary Commission, namely, Professor Belshaw'B exposition of exchange. The reasons given by the Dairy Commission against a bonus on dairy produce are that "it makes no distinction between farmers ... is inequitable both to recipients and taxpayers . provides more assistance than some require or deserve." If this is so of a bonus to one depressed industry, what of the exchange bonus in which a whole depressed industry contributes to the welfare (if in {he long run anyone in New Zealand is benefited) of those in other industries which are comparatively prosperous? Those who approve the commission's argument against a butter bonus must, a thousand times more, condemn the inequity of high exchange, which not only does not discriminate between individuals, but adds to that the inability to discriminate between a whole industry that is thriving and another in the slough of despond. He will be a genius of wordjuggling who can reconcile the words of wisdom emanating from these two commissions bearing on the matter of assisting primary industry. E.L.R.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19341020.2.165.6
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXI, Issue 21396, 20 October 1934, Page 17
Word Count
192EXCHANGE OR BONUS? New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXI, Issue 21396, 20 October 1934, Page 17
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.