Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EXCHANGE OR BONUS?

Sir, —The Dairy Commission's report is -remarkable in that it completely opposes by implication the most vital recommendation of the Monetary Commission, namely, Professor Belshaw'B exposition of exchange. The reasons given by the Dairy Commission against a bonus on dairy produce are that "it makes no distinction between farmers ... is inequitable both to recipients and taxpayers . provides more assistance than some require or deserve." If this is so of a bonus to one depressed industry, what of the exchange bonus in which a whole depressed industry contributes to the welfare (if in {he long run anyone in New Zealand is benefited) of those in other industries which are comparatively prosperous? Those who approve the commission's argument against a butter bonus must, a thousand times more, condemn the inequity of high exchange, which not only does not discriminate between individuals, but adds to that the inability to discriminate between a whole industry that is thriving and another in the slough of despond. He will be a genius of wordjuggling who can reconcile the words of wisdom emanating from these two commissions bearing on the matter of assisting primary industry. E.L.R.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19341020.2.165.6

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXI, Issue 21396, 20 October 1934, Page 17

Word Count
192

EXCHANGE OR BONUS? New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXI, Issue 21396, 20 October 1934, Page 17

EXCHANGE OR BONUS? New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXI, Issue 21396, 20 October 1934, Page 17