LOCAL MANUFACTURE
Sir. —Tn the Herald of Wednesday you publish an address given by Mr. Goodfellow to the New Zealand Farmers' Union in Hamilton in which he attacks tariff protection for local industries. He particularly mentions the paper industrj- iu New Zealand, and quotes figures which are supposed to prove that the wholesale price of wrapping in New Zealand is nearly double that of the c.i.f. price of the Scandinavian article. While his c.i.f. price is approximately correct, he evidently convenientlj* overlooks the fact that due to the farming industry's agitation an exchange rate of 25 per cent is in force, and this makes the landed cost at least £32 17s 3d. The price he quotes is that for second-grade wrapping, the local wholesale selling price of which is £36 Is 6d per ton net. While it is desirable that every aspect of the tariff question should be discussed, it is regrettable that a business man of Mr. Goodfellow's standing should quote misleading figures, which it is charitable to presume he is not personally conversant with. It is even more regrettable that he should do so during the sitting of a commission inquiry into tariff matters. Paper.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19330615.2.185.5
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXX, Issue 21518, 15 June 1933, Page 15
Word Count
197LOCAL MANUFACTURE New Zealand Herald, Volume LXX, Issue 21518, 15 June 1933, Page 15
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.