Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COURT OF APPEAL.

ALGAR VERSUS TASKER. (hV TELEOMAPH.—PRESS ASSOCIATION. ] WELLINGTON. Friday The Court of Appeal did not think it necessaiy to hear counsel for respondent in tho case Algar versus Tasker, in which appellants appealed against a judgment of tho Supremo Court which allowed a claim by tho Public Trustee for tho return of moneys paid by Tasker to Algar .ind his wife, on tho ground that Tasker was mentally defective. Tho Court reserved its decision.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19290706.2.136

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20300, 6 July 1929, Page 16

Word Count
76

COURT OF APPEAL. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20300, 6 July 1929, Page 16

COURT OF APPEAL. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20300, 6 July 1929, Page 16