Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE WAIKATO DIOCESE.

Sir, —J. have no intention of entering into n. public correspondence with Mr* Houchen. I merely write .to say thai; ho is probably correct when he says that the sum owing in the bishop's Memorial Chapel was £4OO, and not £6OO, as staled by me. J understood that at flip time —last July—tho whole jimonnt, £6OO, was owing. I feel that it is only fair to acknowledge this. I adhere absolutely to tho other statements mad 9, in my former letter, including the £IOOO as year's salary. I would also add a fifth condition laid down by his lordship, hut inadvertently overlooked by me, namely, tho vote was to be a unanimous, vxitc <)f the whole synod, I thank Mr. Houciirn for giving me this opportunity of confirming my former statements with this addition. I would also point out that, .-is Mr. Houchen is not a member of-synod and therefore was not present when the offer was made, I find his information is based on second-hand knowledge.

Pi. L. Connolly St. Mark's Vicarage, Te Aroha.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19290501.2.155.6

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20243, 1 May 1929, Page 16

Word Count
178

THE WAIKATO DIOCESE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20243, 1 May 1929, Page 16

THE WAIKATO DIOCESE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20243, 1 May 1929, Page 16