Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RECLAMATION AT COX'S CREEK.

Sir,—As a ratepayer, it is hard for me lo understand why the City Council is improving private property, by carting the deposits from water-table sumps, and the clippings from footpaths, instead of improving its own property'! Some time ago, the council spent thousands of the ratepayers' money in purchasing the old mill site at Cox's Creek, and a resolution was passed, that the property should be reclaimed whenever the council had the necessary spoil. A few loads were carted for a time, hut apparently the council has forgotten that such a property exists, and the/spoil is now being dumped on privately-owned sections. It is going to take a few generations to reclaim Cox's Creek at the present rate, and it is no great credit to the council to spend our money and allow conditions fo remain at a standstill. Ratepayer.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19281023.2.136.1

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXV, Issue 20084, 23 October 1928, Page 12

Word Count
144

RECLAMATION AT COX'S CREEK. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXV, Issue 20084, 23 October 1928, Page 12

RECLAMATION AT COX'S CREEK. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXV, Issue 20084, 23 October 1928, Page 12