DISPUTE OVER PROPERTY.
MISREPRESENTATION DENIED
? CASE FOR THE DEFENDANT.
The case in which Allan Thomas Ariell, .i farmer (Mr. Hall Skelton), claimed £685 :i%u. damages' from Simon Newport Clark, farmer (Mr. Blomfield), was continued in . 1; the Supreme Court yesterday before Mr. Justice Alpers. Plaintiff alleged misrevj . presentations concerning farms at Puketi • 'll, and • Qhaeawai. A counter-claim for £428 - ~•/< was entered by defendant for damages ,1", alleged to have been caused through -I,* plaintiff's occupancy. Mr.' Blomfield moved f<Sr. a non-suit on the ground that according to the evidence plaintiff had elected to adopt the . , contract, and he continued in actual ! rj., possession of the property until Novem,ber. Further, if there was misr'epresen- .. tation, it was innocent. These non-suit points were reserved. Counsel then called evidence to show
there had been no fraud and no mis- • representation. " I Defendant gave evidence of the inspection which plaintiff made of the property and the conversation which occurred on ( that occasion. He also gave evidence in support of his counter-claim, regarding ... the damage done to the property by plaintiff. The case will be continued this morning' '
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19250917.2.138
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXII, Issue 19125, 17 September 1925, Page 13
Word Count
183DISPUTE OVER PROPERTY. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXII, Issue 19125, 17 September 1925, Page 13
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.