Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COMBINERS' WAGES

-.■■■'~-- _—^ii. —__ f ; " -•'••. -.:••'- COURT issues REPORT. MEN'S CLAIM RECOGNISED... :■• ■>jH;; ,;; i ,-: \ _______ )i-i:^Mr'¥:-:^;i y: PROFITS PROHIBIT INCREASE^ . By Telegraph—Press Association—Copyright. ■'.'; i (Received 6.5 p.m.) Renter. ' LONDON. May 9. ,- The report of the Court of Inquiry into the. mining industry has-been published. It states: It is not really disputed that the agreement of 1921 failed ;> to: provide adequate wages in many? f of >; the poorer districts. Hie real issue is far more fundamental. ■'.■,.'-.'.■,'■••'•' The miners assert that they tire entitled i to secure - full living wages for all eriAri;' gaged in the industry, primarily out of 0/. the total profits. If these are inadequate ''„'. I it rests with the mineowners, by altering the organisation of the mines and disposal of the produce, to increase the amount. If the profits are still insufficient to pay a; living wage, the men contend that the character of the misting in-' dustry, which is the foundation of all V other industries in the country, requires that other and more fundamental measures should be adopted. The Court is not concerned with the , merits of : this contention. It is a political question. \ The Court is unable to express an opinion in regard to th& economic possibility and effect of increasing the price of coal,.or of reducing costs sufficiently to , enable the present claim to be met. From figures before the Court, however, it appears that Under the present' conditions the profits in,- particular districts are unable to meet the miners' claim fully. ■-■-■ The owners showed an aggregate, profit for the whole coalfields from October, 1921, to December, 1923, amounting to £37,318,000. ■• It is estimated that had the ■■/..: ;; miners' present claim operated- during sthis period £102,500,000 additional wages would have 4, been paid. In any : case the Sankey-' wage :of two shillings per shift would alone cost annually as'much as the whole' profits for 1923. . " : * I The report :? suggests a ; resumption of negotiations with a view to a modification of the terms of V the 1921 agreement,, which "if 'says appears to' offer immediate practicable means of effecting a new wages . agreement. opinion is expressed that • - provision '-'.a V minimum wage ; should ; have precedence over the distribution of profits, but. the committee cannot specify regarding the basis c upon which that i minimum should be paid.,,, ;: '"v

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19240512.2.83

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18706, 12 May 1924, Page 9

Word Count
379

COMBINERS' WAGES New Zealand Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18706, 12 May 1924, Page 9

COMBINERS' WAGES New Zealand Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18706, 12 May 1924, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert