INTOLERANCE.
■ Sir,lour correspondent, W. Edward Lush, does not deny that immersion was the ancient mode of baptism. J. B. Rotherham, in his work entitled " The New Testament, newly translated (from the Greek text of Tiegelles) and Critically Emphasised," renders Acts 11. 41, s is follows: —"They, indeed, therefore, who welcomed His . word, were immersed, and there were added, in that "day, about / three thousand souls." In Rom. VI., 3-6, Paul speaks of being, "buried with " Him by baptism." St. John 111., 23, i reads: ""And John also was baptising in jEnon, near to Salim, because there was much water there." See also Acts VIII.", ■t. 12 and 36. Mark XVI., 16, says: "Ho s that belioveth and 13 baptized shall be i: saved." Mr. Lush's reference to " feet |~ and hand washing and partial dipping ■ has no spiritual connection with "infant baptism." He quotes .no Scripture which definitely teaches such an ineffica--4 cious doctrine. A baby, of ; course, : is | r utterly incapable of faith or ' repentance and therefore cannot be the ; proper subp ject of baptism. In His "commission to i the Apostles Christ enjoined: "Go va • therefore, and teach all - nations, baptising them in the name of the Father, # ... and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." f This shows the importance that Christ I; attached to baptism, however lightly your correspondent ; may hold it. Apart altogether from the translation of the Greek word baptizo, the question as to «■ whether "infant baptism"-' or immersion was the -practice of the ; early Christian . Church can be decided by reference to what was clone when converts were being admitted into . the church. As regards • your correspondent " A.E.C.," I do not • see anything in > his letter .on the subject of baptism for; me to reply ; to. _ r? . Let your correspondent " J.K." give ■| from the Scriptures chapter and verse ?;'•* teaching infant baptism. , My - previous 0 letter shows that I-quoted the remarks of a recent writer to the effect that immer--5 sion was the universal practice of the TV church until the thirteenth century. Let "J.K." refute' these . assertions, ; if he ;can,, - by : ' quoting m authority. . For the information :j of mv Methodist friend, John Wesley is stated to have admitted that immersion >:'was the ancient practice of the church. "J.K.'s" 'verse of-a hymn;says nothing 1 ■ of infant baptism. Truth.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19231124.2.169.3
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18565, 24 November 1923, Page 15
Word Count
385INTOLERANCE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18565, 24 November 1923, Page 15
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.