Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GERMANY AND THE RUHR.

The German protests against the occupation ■"'.'. of the Ruhr : lack convincing cogency, whatever may quite reasonably be '.urged against the unwisdom of France in taking this particular action. Germany has no good ground*for objecting that the action is: a breach of the Versailles Treaty. The rights and wrongs of the action of France may be a grave concern ;to her Allies; But for Germany to take high ground, and make the occupation of the Ruhr an excuse for denying obligations . incurred by breaking Europe's peace, trampling over Belgium, devastating Northern France, plunging the whole world into grief, , and finally by buying escape from other punishment with a covenant to make reparation, is totally unwarranted. ; The reparation, it must be insisted, is due as ..the solemn penalty .imposed by a great tribunal: and Germany, at the mercy of an outraged world/agreed to the fine inflicted, knowing that an early application of it- would be to ; the restoration of areas ruthlessly injured. The action of France cannot vitiate that claim oh Germany. It remains an obligation to France. Besides, is France the only signatory to the • Treaty with whom Germany has to deal? The rights of* those others ;to have >. the whole engagement of Germany on. their own behalf and that of France, are not destroyed by the action v-»f France.' The Treaty abides as the basis of the ' present: understanding ■ in Europe. • Its provisions may heed review '• . but there is a constitutional way of achieving that. To assert that the action of France absolves Germany from; payment is to -'findin that action * a slender excuse for a dishonourable denial of a responsibility: that responsibility can be discharged only : by a full meeting of it or its abrogation by all parties to its acceptance. ; Until either of these events has happened, Germany's duty is -to: abide: by the obligation. As for protests against the method of the; French- action, Germany is surely very forgetful. It is , not long since Germany set out to '-'stagger -humanity" by the cruelly rathless occupation of Belgium and Northern ;>■; France-— succeeded. Whatever, may be said of the action of France; it should not be said by the arch-criminal of the grtsat wife

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19230115.2.30

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18298, 15 January 1923, Page 6

Word Count
369

GERMANY AND THE RUHR. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18298, 15 January 1923, Page 6

GERMANY AND THE RUHR. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18298, 15 January 1923, Page 6