THE SHIPPING DISPUTE
4i ■■■:,:■ : .■- '■■■■■■;-W----DECISION AGAINST MEN.Vjf^ TWO-MEN WATCH UNNECESSARY. •: ■ ' [AT telegraph.— PRESS ASSOCIATION.] WELLINGTON. Wednesday. '■'■'.$& The Arbitration Court this morning filed '-'ip-i judgment in the case in which it was 'ifj, y asked to interpret points in dispute re- ''-%4 garding an agreement between the Ship. : -v/:v ' owners' Federation and the Seamen's : (:¥fI Union. _'{.'J;- , The Court, on each question, ruled in Y' } favour of the employers' interpretation, . :';; i On the question concerning the twomen watch the Court doultec its juris. ";V; diction, even as a commission under the .-.v.. Regulation of Trade and Commerce m Act, but, reviewing the evidence given, vj§ expressed the opinion that in the plans of vessel concerned in the dispute ihers was no need for tho safe navigation of ships to have two men in the deck i watch in addition to an officer.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19171018.2.27
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LIV, Issue 16673, 18 October 1917, Page 4
Word Count
141THE SHIPPING DISPUTE New Zealand Herald, Volume LIV, Issue 16673, 18 October 1917, Page 4
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.