THE NORTON CASE.
INQUEST ON GROHN'S BODY. MISSING CERTIFICATE OF DEATH. , By Telegraph.—Press Association.—Copyright deceived October 10, 10.37 , p.m.) " ' . __ Std.vkv, October 10. .. x "At the inquest on the body of the man r named Grolin, referred to in the Norton v. Haynes libel case, the Crown Prosecutor stated that the original certificate of death, 1 posted to the registrar, was missing, and 1 apparently hud never been received. The I undertaker who buried the body supplied ■ the particulars two years later,.at the regisj\ trar's request. /, ■. ",'."' » , The undertaker, in his evidence, said i Grohn had every appearance of having died * of the effects of drinking. He saw no ' wounds on the body. • 3 The witness Morris, repealed the evi-' t, dence given at the criminal libel trial, and \ f added that he had stopped Norton, not once, but thousands of times, from knocking Grohn down. He treated him'more, like a dog than a man. V The inquest, was adjourned until Friday,, "■
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19061011.2.60
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIII, Issue 13305, 11 October 1906, Page 5
Word Count
160THE NORTON CASE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIII, Issue 13305, 11 October 1906, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.