OUR RAILWAY TARIFF AND ITS COMPLICATIONS.
' v Q .. , . TO THE KIIITOS. ' ' '■' l >k} Sir.-In my last 1 stated that dnrin, ■ present session of Parliament we & • again treated to the assertion ,iV m,| » ■ ' ■ . charges for the transit of passeii-T < ■ * ' '- V< • goods are the same throughout S '" •'"' ' land, which it is stated can bo soei £- ■■ S. fr \ printed tariff, and it is added that-vf th * ; P only varied by "local rates," whiel, v" 8 ! claimed are necessary to meet m™^: 111 and develop traffic. Exactly ? f? p ?. tlllc: » local rates that create the trouble 1S ** ' u '" 1 Now what do these " local rate-"' - ■; They mean 'rates and charges fixe'd? ! * a 'i*. pi ; railway officials to alter the geneKl ♦ -5 just as they think fit in favour of"or■ - 3r S certain districts, ■■■industries, and'^wtSf> ms *» at .various points along the lines .mj^" l "-' ■ i in fact, differential rates: but' ■ A\al 7 ■*&■ * ■ k rates having been legislate,.! arain'r niia} 1 where, " local rates" have been invMl ,".-'?• I> . supply their place. , ,w«Med **• ■±J ' ' .Co show the full extent to ivhieh (U. ' "local rates are manipulated to hrf„ th£so -' '"' I*'' ; tain districts, industries and people, £ «T" _ .'•• expense of other districts,', indus>nr>« \ >'' ■" people, is a work of far greater n*.a P m»?'i * 6 than I can now find time to undent! Y de that they are so used is beyond dbw« • fact, Sir Joseph Ward pleads them '!,', a reason why the average charge per ton ' * much less on the Hurunni-Bluff «cC.Kn« It* 50 the charge, m Nelson, Mariborotgh>f land,.. Wellington, Taraaaki, HawlV St- 1 and Auckland. 5 D V -"•'.;,;!:••. So persistent has been the \- ' ! U'.* ; of these "local rates" that they SW * ; produced one tariff for Canterbury »,*^ ? 1 ' for Wellington, another for ~H M J still others for various district 3 *? d "1' general tariff is now ■practicaJlj viwW > 1 is -merely a myth. This will be SI' 1 * 1 reference to the goods tariff of Octohor n I ' 1902-the latest I have been able tomS —when it will be found that for goods tr,m alone they (the local rates) coverovK " pages of closely-printed matter. ! If th charge is the same throughout, what if IT .use of these ? " ™ '$ There, is no necessity whatever for tnii confusion, which is created, as I have S aS S for the purpose of.'-rendering the tariff %l' ' intelligible to ordinary people, and wii'h th« avowed object of . compelling users 0 "an ply at the station for their rate." ,°.-., !<!:•' ways Report for 1884. The power audi ,* . * system places in the hand; of railway con trailers must be apparent to everybody and it is this power they are fighting to re 'iain :| Twenty years ago 1 was warned by friendly ex-railway men that : the officials would%d 'I !• to the last over this question."' My fiituj* ' I' were right. That the present system of levying railway ' '' ■ '''' rates, and charges gives great dissatisfaction cannot be doubted. This in •'cause d'aumbr : by the uncertainly which everywhere sur. ' round.? them. Producers can never tell from year to year, and rarely from menta 1 ' ; - '■■ to month, what their transit charges will be : » and consequently cannot closely:calculate th« cost of production. There has been a great dpal ,of legislation' : in England, America, and other countries- to': try to remedy. this evil, but so far without much effect. In fact, nothing, can. remedy ' ■ , : it, except the discovery of some method of making a fixed scale of fares, rates, and charges, and depriving the officials of all power to alter it. Tins has been done with reference to postal rates, and there sis no .■ I reason, whatever why it should not be done with railway rates. , < [ There is another form of ..differential rating ' in use on our lines which is .very- dishonest • and injurious to- the whole community, and that ))ls granting "special rates for quanta, - : ties. I believe it is largely owing to this ! practice that the difference, in the charge to the users, of the Hurunui-Bluff* 6eetiou° iind ! i the users of all the other lines in the colony : ; is due. ! These special rates for quantities are severely legislated against in England, and are ab- ■ • ' solutely prohibited. Hero they are made legal by Aot of Parliament, What they ' ' mean is clearly a low rate to the rich and a high rate to the poor. They no doubt we very beneficial to the large grain dealers of - - Canterbury and Otago, but they must work very heavily against the great "mass of our •' ' ' farmers, and all our small, producers, and' are also a burden on the general taxpayer. . Sir Joseph and hia officials may say what v.hey "please; they- may multip-h- and confuse ' the rates if they like, till it is utterly inpoi. ' ; ", "■ able to show how and where the trick ii done, but that it is done is .easily provable from their own ■ statements" and figures h«v cannot conceal the ;total outcome,' and I • • \ • nave .shown that the only explanation' -tier I have so far offered is an utterly incorrect statement. The Hurunui-Blulf section does ' not carry the largest proportion of lowcks ! traffic. It is the Auckland section that doc? this.—l am, etc., Samom Vail*. ■ Auckland, October 22, 1903. ■ .
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19031026.2.68.6
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XL, Issue 12402, 26 October 1903, Page 6
Word Count
858OUR RAILWAY TARIFF AND ITS COMPLICATIONS. New Zealand Herald, Volume XL, Issue 12402, 26 October 1903, Page 6
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.