Article image
Article image

An interesting point as to how far drum, <■§ kenness rosy he raised as a defence to an '$ action for slander came before the Mel- . (rf bourne Full Court the other day. Mrs. Heifer- ? nan, of Caulfield, had instituted an action <fM against James Hayes, the well-known jockey, claiming £1000 for slander. Defendant pleaded in defence that if the words com- 15 plained of were used, they were while he was j suffering temporary madness caused by ex- 'b| cessive drinking. Justice Hodges ordered that this ground of defence , be, struck out of the pleadings, as it was no ;:i| defence, and was unnecessary and embarrass- jA ing. Hayes appealed to the Full Court against this decision, but the Full Court up-. | held the view expressed by Justice Hodges, . '.<||| and dismissed the appeal. ' - Wt xm\ tV:feiftt

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18991024.2.44.2

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVI, Issue 11202, 24 October 1899, Page 5

Word Count
135

Page 5 Advertisements Column 2 New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVI, Issue 11202, 24 October 1899, Page 5

Page 5 Advertisements Column 2 New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVI, Issue 11202, 24 October 1899, Page 5