Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAW AND POLICE.

S MAGISTRATE'S COUBT—THUBSDAT. Mr. H. W. Brabant, S.M.] $ 7 UXDEFEKDED CASES. - ,l. following cases judgment went in | IS «"?_?'Stiff by default :-F. W. King l 5 Main V. - Brady, claim, £4 12s! i? P l '' £. 7W. Hcmns (Mr. Gittos) v. GnsP Both claim £1 ss, costs 10s; A. J. EnI and' Co. (Mr. Clayton) v. G. H. Woods, iS If? nio 13s, costs £3 8s;- S. J. Best and fj® 1 ® 7 Tanner, claim £18 2s Id, costs 15s ; I filter James Hill (Mr. Mahouy) v - Marclsim possession and rent, £5, costs g 2,° a. M• E. Porter and Co. (Mi. Clayton) t Gillespie, claim £25 4s 6d, costs £2 I !i c George M. Lenihan (Mr. Shera) v. t ''MkCronin, claim £19, costs £1 10s 6d; f ! I c Cochrane (Mr. Kissling) v. John R. I ! ft claim £24, costs £2 17.; Hall and I ? & (Mr. Burton) v. Bridge and Best, ! . htal xod, costs ss; Robert W. Gallagher I r Burton) v. Robert S. Brown K Elizabeth Brown, claim 17s 6d, I m;U gj; judgment against the defendant | v g Brown and against the separate estate '■ f liii wife, E. Brown; Louisa Heaty (Mr. 5' J l<m ) v. C. Collins, claim £4 5s 2d, costs 8 ids' Jagg" 11,1(1 Co ' (Mr " Burton ' v - W. fe L' ]e claim £1 5s sd, costs ss; Jagger and I Co. (Jfr Burton) v. A. Stewart claim £5, S costs £1 Os 6d. ■,i plaintiff xon-sbited. I The case Alexander Bell v. John PilkingI to was a claim for possession of tenement I nd £1 '> rent ( ' llO ' or six wee ' £s at 46 per S Jreet. Mr. C. E. Button appeared in sup|l nort of the claim and Mr. Brookfield for tho S Sefenec. The evidence of the plaintiff having if: e en taken, Mr. Button said lie would not I prosecute tho claim any furthei. His Worf; ship accordingly non-suited plaintiff, with f- costs £3 Is for defendant. CLAIU FOB POSSESSION OP TENEMENT. I In the case Louis H. Neumegon v. John I Leydon, the plaintiff claimed for possession A 0 f a boardinghouso and promises, known as 1 "The Coffee Palace," situate in Cook-street. ; jj, Ncumegcn, jun., conducted the plaintiff's rase, and the defendant was not represented : | by counsel. Evidcnco for and against the claim being heard, judgment went for plaintiff. with costs, the defendant being allowed 14 dsya in which to vacate the premises.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18981104.2.82

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 10901, 4 November 1898, Page 7

Word Count
407

LAW AND POLICE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 10901, 4 November 1898, Page 7

LAW AND POLICE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 10901, 4 November 1898, Page 7