LAW AND POLICE.
S MAGISTRATE'S COUBT—THUBSDAT. Mr. H. W. Brabant, S.M.] $ 7 UXDEFEKDED CASES. - ,l. following cases judgment went in | IS «"?_?'Stiff by default :-F. W. King l 5 Main V. - Brady, claim, £4 12s! i? P l '' £. 7W. Hcmns (Mr. Gittos) v. GnsP Both claim £1 ss, costs 10s; A. J. EnI and' Co. (Mr. Clayton) v. G. H. Woods, iS If? nio 13s, costs £3 8s;- S. J. Best and fj® 1 ® 7 Tanner, claim £18 2s Id, costs 15s ; I filter James Hill (Mr. Mahouy) v - Marclsim possession and rent, £5, costs g 2,° a. M• E. Porter and Co. (Mi. Clayton) t Gillespie, claim £25 4s 6d, costs £2 I !i c George M. Lenihan (Mr. Shera) v. t ''MkCronin, claim £19, costs £1 10s 6d; f ! I c Cochrane (Mr. Kissling) v. John R. I ! ft claim £24, costs £2 17.; Hall and I ? & (Mr. Burton) v. Bridge and Best, ! . htal xod, costs ss; Robert W. Gallagher I r Burton) v. Robert S. Brown K Elizabeth Brown, claim 17s 6d, I m;U gj; judgment against the defendant | v g Brown and against the separate estate '■ f liii wife, E. Brown; Louisa Heaty (Mr. 5' J l<m ) v. C. Collins, claim £4 5s 2d, costs 8 ids' Jagg" 11,1(1 Co ' (Mr " Burton ' v - W. fe L' ]e claim £1 5s sd, costs ss; Jagger and I Co. (Jfr Burton) v. A. Stewart claim £5, S costs £1 Os 6d. ■,i plaintiff xon-sbited. I The case Alexander Bell v. John PilkingI to was a claim for possession of tenement I nd £1 '> rent ( ' llO ' or six wee ' £s at 46 per S Jreet. Mr. C. E. Button appeared in sup|l nort of the claim and Mr. Brookfield for tho S Sefenec. The evidence of the plaintiff having if: e en taken, Mr. Button said lie would not I prosecute tho claim any furthei. His Worf; ship accordingly non-suited plaintiff, with f- costs £3 Is for defendant. CLAIU FOB POSSESSION OP TENEMENT. I In the case Louis H. Neumegon v. John I Leydon, the plaintiff claimed for possession A 0 f a boardinghouso and promises, known as 1 "The Coffee Palace," situate in Cook-street. ; jj, Ncumegcn, jun., conducted the plaintiff's rase, and the defendant was not represented : | by counsel. Evidcnco for and against the claim being heard, judgment went for plaintiff. with costs, the defendant being allowed 14 dsya in which to vacate the premises.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18981104.2.82
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 10901, 4 November 1898, Page 7
Word Count
407LAW AND POLICE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 10901, 4 November 1898, Page 7
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.