Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE KEAST CASE.

TO THK EDITOR. Siß.-Y.our paper of the 23rd November, hag been handed to me containing a report of the trial of the man Richard H. Keast. Unfortunately I am his lawful wife, but am not the person whom he is said to have taken away from a rescue home in Brisbane in 1890. That town I have never seen, but in 1891 I met Keast in Victoria, and was married to him at Ballarat in that year. We came to Fiji iu 1892, and I have since resided here. He left me at Snva with three children to support in April of this year, but in fact I have always had to work hard as a dressmaker, etc., to maintain the family, so that his imprisonment is no loss to us. I was living with my parents at Newstead, Victoria, when I unfortunately first met Keast. I will thank you to insert this as many of my friends are not aware of the true facts. There has uevor been a blot against my character.—l am, etc., Annie Keast. Suva, Fiji, December 11,1897.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18971217.2.11.2

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 10628, 17 December 1897, Page 3

Word Count
185

THE KEAST CASE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 10628, 17 December 1897, Page 3

THE KEAST CASE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIV, Issue 10628, 17 December 1897, Page 3