LAW AND POLICE.

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 10132, 15 May 1896, Page 6

LAW AND POLICE.

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.— (Before Mr.H. W. Nortbcroft, S.M.I

Undefended Cases.—Judgment was given for plain with costs, in the following cases s—«A- Grubb v.' W. O'Keefe, claim £2 18s, costs 6j ; Donald and Edenborongh (Mr. Burton) v, R. H. Seccombe, claim £4 7s, costs lis; R. .W. Brown (Mr, Braasey) v. T. Oldfield, claim £12 10s, costs £1 19s 6d; A. F. Stilwell (Mr., Burton} v. J. Christopher, claim £'219s 3d, costs lis; Seemer, Lanjrgath, and Co. (Mr. Mahony) v. Henry; and Co., claim £8 10s, costs £1 5s 64; J. Burns and Co. (Mr. Reed) v, J. Merritt, claim £10 14s 10d, costs £1 los 6d; J. Russell, (Mr. •Tonka) v. Radford and Radford, claim £10, costs £1 6d; R. and W, Hellaby (Mr. Burton) v. W. JEL Thompson, claim £2 2i sd, Costs lis; A. J. Whitfciagton (Mr. Nicholson) v.' W. J. Hawk, claim £5 4s 7d, costs £1.53 6d?T. Melville (Mr.'Reed) v. J. C. Good, claim £10, costs £1- 12s 6d; J. Lawson (Mr. McAHster) v. H. Bennett, claim Si 13s, costs £1 Is, E. Robertos v. H. Cojihisgs. ; — Claim £1 53, due to the estate ,of the late Dr. La wry, for medical attendance. Mr. Battley 'appeared, foe the plaintiff, and Mr. Cum--mings conducted his own case.' The defence submitted that but one visit bad been made, and not five, as claimed for. Judgment was entered for plaintiff for amount claimed, and 6j costa were allowed. B. Crisp v. F. Fitz.—Claim £3. After evidence was taken, judgment was entered for defendant with 8s costs.