Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IMPORTANT QUESTION of COPY RIGHT.

A'case of groat importance to photographers; and in lepsdesree to artists generally, was de-u-iitly'by the British Court of" Appeal.. It appoare-that \vhenth.u -Australians cricketer.? were. , play ing "at, , the Oval, ..the' London Stereoscopic Company.deputed one of-their i employes to photograph the team. The nega-tive-was tkeu registered under.theprovision's of the Copyright Act, in the names of Messrs. Nott'-ge and Kinnaird,' who trade under tho name of tho above company. -This photograph was alleged to have been pirated by a photographer ofLaeck, i:ain"d Jackson, who was thereupon made defendant in an action for. infringement of copyright. The Act provides that the.name of the "author" of a painting, drawing or photograph shall he registered with tbe subject, and Mr.'-Jas'tise Field, before whom the afction was originally tried, held that the '"man who actually took the negative was the author within the meaning of the Act," and so £,ave judgment for tlie defendant. Against this decision the plaintiffs appealed, and their Lor jijhips confirmed the decision of.the Court below, and dismissed the appeal with costs.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18830929.2.55

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XX, Issue 6823, 29 September 1883, Page 2 (Supplement)

Word Count
176

IMPORTANT QUESTION of COPY RIGHT. New Zealand Herald, Volume XX, Issue 6823, 29 September 1883, Page 2 (Supplement)

IMPORTANT QUESTION of COPY RIGHT. New Zealand Herald, Volume XX, Issue 6823, 29 September 1883, Page 2 (Supplement)