Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

State Or Producer Control?

[Special to “Northern Advocate”] AUCKLAND, This Day. A protest against the erection of expensive buildings for the Internal Marketing Department, which .it was considered, indicated a continued control by the State of farm products, was voiced at today’s session of the Auckland Provincial Council of the New Zealand Farmers’ Union. A remit expressing the opinion that Such control was expensive and wasteful and that control should be exercised by those who were financially concerned, that is, the producers, was carried. Mr. H. M. Rushworth said that in the altered world conditions there must be some form of control, either by the State or by the producers. If State control was opposed, then the union must be nrepared to foster producer control, as was suggested in the remit.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19410523.2.95

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 23 May 1941, Page 6

Word Count
131

State Or Producer Control? Northern Advocate, 23 May 1941, Page 6

State Or Producer Control? Northern Advocate, 23 May 1941, Page 6