SPLENDID ENTRY FOR WHANGAREI TOURNEY
Bowls
Exceptionally good support has been accorded the Whangarei Bowling Club's annual full-rink tournament, which will commence on Saturday next, and continue over three days.
Forty teams will participate, including rinks from as far south as Cambridge and Pukekohe. Teams have entered from Auckland, Helensville, Kaukapakapa, Maungaturoto, Portland, Kensington, Hikurangi, Dargaville and as far north as Kaitaia. The draw is as follows: —■
Section 1
First day at Kensington, second and third days at Whangarei. Round I.—Littlejohn v. Taylor, Parker v. Davey, Hill v. Allan, Whitelaw v. Drinnan, Vodanovich v. Beehre, Stark v. Orr. Round 2.—Vodanovich v. Drinnan, Taylor v. Orr, Littlejohn v. Parker, Static v. Beehre, Hill v. Davey, Whitelaw v. Allan. Round 3.—Beehre v. Orr, Littlejohn v. Hill, Whitelaw v. Davey, Vodanovich v. Allan, Stark v. Drinnan, Taylor v. Parker.
Round 4.—Taylor v. Hill, Beehre v. Drinnan, Littlejohn v. Whitelaw, Vodanovich v. Davey, Parker v. Orr, Stark v. Allan.
Round s.—Davey v. Stark, Taylor v. Whitelaw, Parker v. Hill, Beehre v. Allan, Littlejohn v. Vodanovich. Drinnan v. Orr. Round' 6. —Parker v. Whitelaw,
Littlejohn v. Stark, Beehre v. Davey, Hill v. Orr, Drinnan v. Allan. Taylor v. Vodanovich. Round 7. —Drinnan v. Davey, Parker v. Vodanovich. Taylor v. Stark. Allan v. Orr. Hill v. Whitelaw. Littlejohn v. Beehre. Section 3. First and third days at Whangarei, second day at Kensington. Round I.—Blanshard v. F. Cox. Bagby v. Curtis, McKinnon v. Miller, McLeod v. Williams, Tucker v. Keith, Everett v. Dickey.
Round 2.—Tucker v. Williams, F. Cox v. Dickey, Blanshard v. Bagby, Everett v. Keith, McKinnon v. Curtis, McLeod v. Miller,
Round 3. —Keith v. Dickey, Elanshard v. McKinnon, McLeod v. Curtis, Tucker v. Miller, Everett v. Williams, F. Cox v. Bagby. Round 4. —F. Cox v. McKinnon, Keith v. Williams, Blanshard v. McLeod, Tucker v. Curtis, Bagby v. Dickey, Everett v. Miller. Round s.—Curtis v. Everett, F. Cox v. McLeod, Bagby v. McKinnon, Keith v. Miller, Blanshard v. Tucker, Williams v. Dickey. Round 6.—Bagby v. McLeod, Blanshard v, Everett, Keith v. Curtis, Mc-
Kinnon v. Dickey, Williams v. Miller, F. Cox v. Tucker. Round 7. —Williams v. Curtis. Bagby v. Tucker, F. Cox v. Everett, Miller v. Dickey, McKinnon v. McLeod, Blanshard v, Keith.
Section 3
First and second days at Whangarei, third day at Kensington., Round 1. —Morris v. B. Cox, Holmes v. Cowie, Bcag v. Nesbitt, Bayliss v. Wilding. Round 2.—Nesbitt v. Wilding, Boag v. Bayliss, B, Cox v. Cowie, Morris v. Holmes. Round 3. —Cowie v. Bayliss, Morris v. Nesbitt, Holmes v. Wilding, B. Cox v. Boag. Round 4. —Holmes v. Boag, B. Cox v. Wilding, Morris v. Bayliss, Cowie v. Nesbitt.
Round s.—Morris v. Cowie, Holmes v. Bayliss, B. Cox v. Nesbitt. Boag v. Wilding. Round 6. —Cowie v. Wilding, B. Cox v. Bayliss, Morris v. Boag. Holmes v. Nesbitt.
Round 7.—Morris v. Wilding, Nesbitt v. Bayliss, Cowie v. Boag. B. Cox v. Holmes.
Section 4.
First and second days at Whangarei, third day at Kensington.
Round 1. —Coutts v. Kelly, Reynolds v. Courtney, Cutforth v. Dr. Greville, Tibbits v. Brewis. Round 2. —Dr. Greville v. Brewis, Cutforth v. Tibbits, Kelly v. Courtney, Coutts v. Reynolds. Round 3. —Courtney v. Tibbits, Coutts v. Dr. Greville, Reynolds v. Brewis, Kelly v. Cutforth. Round 4.—Reynolds v. Cutforth, Kelly v. Brewis, Coutts v. Tibbits. Courtney v. Dr. Greville. Round 5. —Reynolds v. Tibbits, Coutts v. Courtney, Kelly v. Dr. Grcville, Cutforth v. Brewis.
Round G.—Courtney v. Erewis, Kelly v. Tibbits, Coutts v. Cutforth, Reynolds v. Dr. Greville. Round 7.—Coutts v. Brew is, Kelly v. Reynolds, Courtney v. Cutforth. Dr. Greville v. Tibbits.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19380126.2.82
Bibliographic details
Northern Advocate, 26 January 1938, Page 10
Word Count
599SPLENDID ENTRY FOR WHANGAREI TOURNEY Northern Advocate, 26 January 1938, Page 10
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Northern Advocate. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.