Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

(Before J. S. Clendon, Esq., KM.) WEDtfESDAY March 7th, 1688. Seocombe v. Brooker. This was an action brought nguinst Brooker for the recovery of £15 value of a horse killed by a collision between the parties about a year ago. The evidence is not of public importance. Judgement deferred until Monday. Laubence v. Babe. This was an action brought for the recovery of £50 for damages inflicted on Laurence's property consequent on a bush fire lighted by Babe. There was a great amount of conflicting evidence, especially as to the amount of damage done. Jndgement in this case also was deferred until Monday.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA18880310.2.21

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 10 March 1888, Page 3

Word Count
106

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Northern Advocate, 10 March 1888, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Northern Advocate, 10 March 1888, Page 3