Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LICENSING LAWS

> Thos. Nixon, held to be responsible for the actions of his barman, 1 was fined £1 and 10/- costs on a ’ charge of selling liquor' after hours. ’ Mr. Ongley, who appeared for de- ■ fendant, stated that the licensee had \ refused to supply liquor to the person who sought it but the latter subsequently prevailed upon the barman. Richard Jago, to get it for him. His f Worship imposed a fine of £5 and • 10/- costs upon the barman, who was charged with supplying.” 1 Thos Henry Wilson did not appear when hi.s name was called to answer a charge of being 'on licensed premis- , es after hours —Fined £2 and costs s IQ/-. t Wm. George Moore, guilty of being 3 on licensed promises after hours, was fined £2 and costs 10/-.. ' George Newton, similarly charged, , was found guilty and also fined £2 and 10/- costs

20,000 good readers and spenders constitute the subscribers to the “Timefl.”

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19270405.2.5

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume LII, Issue 3575, 5 April 1927, Page 2

Word Count
159

LICENSING LAWS Manawatu Times, Volume LII, Issue 3575, 5 April 1927, Page 2

LICENSING LAWS Manawatu Times, Volume LII, Issue 3575, 5 April 1927, Page 2